Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage

Aldrin Isaac <aldrin.isaac@gmail.com> Mon, 12 June 2017 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <aldrin.isaac@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30FD128768 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GEmPpCGak0xw for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x236.google.com (mail-ot0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92178127076 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x236.google.com with SMTP id a2so73241827oth.2 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kafUqn8F0C/W+CWRPWRb8U0czt+Gap2J9f/QVWuRsws=; b=hMslmv9QUKpNDGTDylsi7eRFGcg6CWq3EglJ7HsWy5PNHCLqAEeUYJd1Omi4CG6fvp vi5zgASNlmOwCHvIrP7OK5hZCleXULZ/9Ie3G82YDFGgLJ2621QgOliryDs7vXZgVPXD PW9yAbIEB4k8xGEIPZljM49n3tkpTUJIqmM9Lq94oNcxuGNOVota90IQR1rTPq9QRYaQ aQGfSCMrnd0Y6i2CdkXx47teYu0Thiy2O0nGuBk0sK0FDM1QFtDox5aMNVPgmGRIQOg1 DNL5yZRUqhisVxZ0u1dlIcQaKuK4FjoTPe4MumyU7EA46n5bme4ppB/NcIoriWL7e7gW 57sg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kafUqn8F0C/W+CWRPWRb8U0czt+Gap2J9f/QVWuRsws=; b=YesuRMPSKdK0+hfDC4YvS2tXzy9hxqMkNbc11pFuYegBU+AoDqrPe//CZlfyGMVVmE UA+Ddl3iDkAyXX5zHBi49OnINd0UWYgMdGzAymkuLgOUFWC+Jpv48kuXq7VOymZK8HmE s0eM1qu7vrwney5TNfehowdF69CCHQUalxRQ0eZvmO+46qjB9NYDe6bDpRw0FB0i6Yl4 if43iv5oVTi94U0SS2bXREMDPPIKrE4QK7gvwp6i3yuIx6qnqQiQCuTBE/j57UVgQV5Y DXGUslRo6SES/PvSHziY2pmNGZVgv8pLSqcQ8610e9G+/Ja+TNb1Qq2HMEJQspTR79Np U4sw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAQJQlfRVE29qlwuIoSxCLMap7/GhR7jjkyO3Ioe7WYWvzqR45z 2KKqMExdZJYjFPVe4F5jzp8K3QRmGA==
X-Received: by 10.157.84.45 with SMTP id j45mr33675641oth.183.1497297190038; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b41bd33c-cbd9-cbc6-a2b5-614da7ae1115@nokia.com> <CAERD1dLm=NG8g=b1Cb7+cVEvfo-X+qSzW+ukQBeUGFct1bysBQ@mail.gmail.com> <B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F2B3277E0@MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com>
In-Reply-To: <B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F2B3277E0@MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com>
From: Aldrin Isaac <aldrin.isaac@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 19:52:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOA2mbxMUXU3TmHAU0Hyp1V4it_OqDjuHxOmtKGL1eJzf042zQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>, Senad IETF - Internet Engineering Task Force <senad.ietf@gmail.com>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Cc: BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f4030439589822b0860551c8abf5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/ZRUopOgeDJXUk_QHVvnWRsYchfw>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 19:53:13 -0000

Yes. I support to move this forward.

Regards -- Aldrin
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:39 PM UTTARO, JAMES <ju1738@att.com> wrote:

> *Fully support as co-author..I am not aware of any IPR related to this
> document..*
>
>
>
> *Thanks,*
>
> *                Jim Uttaro*
>
>
>
> *From:* BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Senad IETF -
> Internet Engineering Task Force
> *Sent:* Monday, June 12, 2017 3:29 PM
> *To:* Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
> *Cc:* BESS <bess@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage
>
>
>
> Full support of this document for RFC publication.  As a co-author, I am
> not aware of any IPR related to this document.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Martin Vigoureux <
> martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Working Group,
>
> This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04 [1] which is considered mature and ready for
> a final working group review.
>
> Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent
> version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than
> *20th of June*.
> Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is
> also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as an
> Informational RFC.
>
> *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
> applies to draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage, to ensure that IPR has been
> disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and
> 5378 for more details).
>
> If you are listed as a document Author or Contributor of
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04 please respond to this email and indicate
> whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
>
> Note that, as of today, no IPR has been disclosed against this document or
> its earlier versions.
>
> As opposed to the policy [2], we are not polling for knowledge of
> implementations as it does not seem to make sense in that case. If you feel
> otherwise, please let us know.
>
> Thank you,
> M&T
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage/
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbess-2Devpn-2Dusage_&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q&m=NsXRNCpI-XG9vxejXm9NHxu1FVv_j2gAG3NSW3vZPh8&s=RuJG5P3GiwU0kDVlo12PU41vXQ4DzY-_xqvgolWjkq4&e=>
> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailarchive.ietf.org_arch_msg_bess_cG3X1tTqb-5FvPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q&m=NsXRNCpI-XG9vxejXm9NHxu1FVv_j2gAG3NSW3vZPh8&s=tLVXhULe4bJzbVBsBOybultgu62EreH6szg5v5-j5As&e=>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_bess&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q&m=NsXRNCpI-XG9vxejXm9NHxu1FVv_j2gAG3NSW3vZPh8&s=ocQqmy844e0BOlY73StBUg5Zh5vxs8JaCD6hhDXfm7Q&e=>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>