[bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07

Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 31 March 2019 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FBE1201C0; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 13:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags.all@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.94.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <155406348044.12345.16546699941704674212@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 13:18:00 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/ZwvvhxDvWllrxsmYe7-ytwu3v7M>
Subject: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 20:18:01 -0000

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review result: Ready

I read the document and think it is ready. IDNits warnings and comments are
easily/automatically fixed when new version is submitted.

I only have few editorial nits/suggestions.
* Section 5.1 says "Assuming the below specified network topology.." while it
could also use an exact reference to Figure 1. * Section 5 is written so that
it assumed the reader has already read Section 6. Maybe swapping Sections 5 and
6 order would make sense?