IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07: (with COMMENT)

Ravi Singh <ravis@juniper.net> Sat, 20 April 2019 02:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ravis@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1B012045A; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.363, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KmeF5pYXsSFM; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F15F1205CC; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108161.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3K29JTC023226; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:09:19 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=jLixOCwgjFqOLILK0tgSerRMckNo8qKeMknGPGATQCw=; b=W9qMY6KtYo5NDnnnE8TBwpQaJGat2K8gqwMxNm009mBWC8i0MF84ZjyUydqQTzRz+5yv NVF8PYkIvez9hlWMpRNcvyNQk1AGD4Hm/Y/ur1lsLOHwD4MXQmhOjfcbGaK2CGvMFl8i eZqQ+QG36YCSXRsy8cCDEuMKlED8xyPasSWOrVPrCWuFlTn1Coug1Iju1GjFV5TOoyZj Ld7bZTo/FXTFGkSoAJkJe95ppcUZMtPV9qfVRD1VaobZbtdEO+buCeTywz5sHS2ps9p/ CD6HICeQ5YYVFc5hRxwGknZ3MAUdpb2W0hOXsKoHCcECzhIXswCTrX+Pemv9BcsX/53H HQ==
Received: from nam02-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02lp2056.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.38.56]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ryjuxrge1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:09:19 -0700
Received: from BYAPR05MB4408.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.202.158) by BYAPR05MB5141.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.177.231.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1835.7; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:09:13 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4408.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::655d:a12d:1434:d92]) by BYAPR05MB4408.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::655d:a12d:1434:d92%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1835.007; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:09:13 +0000
From: Ravi Singh <ravis@juniper.net>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags@ietf.org>, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHU6vjmfr9uLP00d0GMOxKX3+frAaZCsr7g
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:09:13 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR05MB4408BB81D1F8BD8D242C428CAB200@BYAPR05MB4408.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <155439077860.30886.5079044693331454522.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155439077860.30886.5079044693331454522.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.11]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 36ea1725-0a82-41a9-57e9-08d6c5352f6c
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR05MB5141;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB5141:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB5141385DE1DB6709BDA1090CAB200@BYAPR05MB5141.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0013079544
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(136003)(346002)(366004)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(966005)(86362001)(33656002)(73956011)(53546011)(66574012)(14454004)(53936002)(6246003)(6306002)(19627235002)(7696005)(9686003)(305945005)(99286004)(76176011)(102836004)(478600001)(5660300002)(446003)(66446008)(66946007)(76116006)(486006)(64756008)(11346002)(66476007)(256004)(14444005)(6506007)(26005)(224303003)(186003)(74316002)(52536014)(55016002)(71190400001)(81156014)(54906003)(316002)(66066001)(68736007)(476003)(7736002)(2906002)(6116002)(8936002)(81166006)(3846002)(25786009)(229853002)(97736004)(66556008)(6436002)(71200400001)(110136005)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR05MB5141; H:BYAPR05MB4408.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: f5h/fQhrK5iAdXYDC6zNt/CjcMwW5MlMCf0m6XLHayDTAGmD4n+Ao9J623Zw6lbV0myHYmeMx/+VbA8prgbOwZpPY6cQJKhyu7p8MY9O43dSrqLyCnSMFlWwUw5toswUsW3UwE1CYMdMf3kfSUmJn6Ok9X9r/iUAM6uLQjTKwWv21bPKkyQ2n0BRnJ+i+u0pPYVqwzh61FpP40Xr3l7A8PG4KRWp0q+6+Fr/x0vTOOI21YCZKdfMhxFMCbYe26H0PH9HfIgr03GR/zk7XqF9ZkptfSlE2/7HH03Ha3Xsgq3ZyFVjD33hmWzF2LcwHsk/VtafVtfgSsVDwsskGGWBJuByrG9bNmhmNh9l8Td+dmUEG0AK8fgOwthwnNHRFOB1Hj/wA6DHzPVECRH5la4RFxpBW6r6h044NSgZzaCSZtU=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 36ea1725-0a82-41a9-57e9-08d6c5352f6c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Apr 2019 02:09:13.7512 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB5141
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-20_01:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=852 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904200015
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/QsO-9BjszwSLtL-i8lKmKgMNGn0>
Subject: Re: [bess] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:09:34 -0000

Hi Mirja
> Given this document updates the normative behaviour of RFC 4761, I would
> have expected to see some discussion about interoperability. Is the
> behaviour as specified in RFC 4761 not widely deployed/implemented or
> would it be possible to add some sentences about interoperability which
> already deployed devices?

There are no interop considerations since this is new add-on behavior to cause PW to come whereas earlier the PW would not even come up.
Regards
Ravi


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 8:13 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags@ietf.org; Mach Chen
> <mach.chen@huawei.com>; bess-chairs@ietf.org; mach.chen@huawei.com;
> bess@ietf.org
> Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-
> flags-07: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.ietf.org_iesg_statement_discuss-
> 2Dcriteria.html&d=DwIDaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-
> ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=6ArkE4n20mNZQF6JxrMYwJyAGBWWjzhSIC2O3-
> fXPV4&m=sRYoRhlmH7BG89gXNxxxppiwdiP1flSwEpo9K-EXMV0&s=kp-
> Yisx5GTzgoz49kcReFJc4zVl-a8FCsHWwPIvCXUc&e=
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbess-2Dbgp-2Dvpls-2Dcontrol-
> 2Dflags_&d=DwIDaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-
> ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=6ArkE4n20mNZQF6JxrMYwJyAGBWWjzhSIC2O3-
> fXPV4&m=sRYoRhlmH7BG89gXNxxxppiwdiP1flSwEpo9K-
> EXMV0&s=JbGb4ouK0vh5A38h3j65nEWXj9o9L1YR9WKIGs40QYs&e=
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Given this document updates the normative behaviour of RFC 4761, I would
> have expected to see some discussion about interoperability. Is the
> behaviour as specified in RFC 4761 not widely deployed/implemented or
> would it be possible to add some sentences about interoperability which
> already deployed devices?
> 
> One minor editorial request:
> - Please expand PE on first occurrence.
>

v2.40.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status