Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-08

"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com> Wed, 06 December 2017 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9947124207; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 12:25:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CXlGMWgJ8lJw; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 12:25:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FFF11200FC; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 12:25:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6030; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1512591918; x=1513801518; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=KHv61XDkIOdO2ZdwYZysDbj/WxZiYcei3ULSd9qumYU=; b=m/wl73+CafvkJg3iJhCvURFGavTjVK5UUplsnUZipWgNFSoDVs27Gv+w WkCDRKlNI2PSSXxJ6URfoEN57drCtWVzhzWXtderM9khiiL024tiD2hcu k9xcbFSwo9VCB/9I+e/FaEd+vuBa/+Yai0k0c1AGKyp8ttknS7F9+SdR5 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DdAwCQUSha/4YNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYJKc2ZwLoN7mRuBV5Fgh2AKhTsCGoU6QhUBAQEBAQEBAQFrKIU?= =?us-ascii?q?jBiNWEAIBCA40AgICMCUCBAENiURkqSGCJyaKMAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAR2FXINoC4J3iDYxgjIFmT+JPgKVF5NbliYCERkBgTkBNSOBTm8VZAGBf4R?= =?us-ascii?q?UiVCBFQEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.45,369,1508803200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="40667114"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Dec 2017 20:25:17 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (xch-rtp-004.cisco.com [64.101.220.144]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vB6KPG3f032596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 6 Dec 2017 20:25:17 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) by XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:25:16 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:25:16 -0500
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, "thomas.morin@orange.com" <thomas.morin@orange.com>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
CC: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-08
Thread-Index: AQHTbUnIE1F0wt2PNkWhZhKoHul01KM04mOAgABAs4CAAOF7AIAAxLYA///KfwA=
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 20:25:16 +0000
Message-ID: <8288808A-708C-465D-8868-AFFE685D70B8@cisco.com>
References: <CAMMESsw2x53Av-_zi5nL5czKCXYmi_mk0i6qyYYZDYHE8oo_tA@mail.gmail.com> <3ca43a6b-2716-ff87-76da-ab520f23c6b4@nokia.com> <23037_1512483940_5A26AC64_23037_392_5_1512483939.26596.80.camel@orange.com> <109CAA9D-AA82-423E-8CEE-E721A1879D33@cisco.com> <CAMMESsyRiT+d+9p5w_E4HMdCgb-JMRSaf-e6OFBiNT7iGvh4rg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsyRiT+d+9p5w_E4HMdCgb-JMRSaf-e6OFBiNT7iGvh4rg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.28.0.171108
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.76.52]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8288808A708C465D8868AFFE685D70B8ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/_XI7cDSAdjE90KpobObkThia404>
Subject: Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-08
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 20:25:20 -0000


I will add the following sentence to the abstract.
“This specification is also applicable to other NVO encapsulations such as GENEVE, GPE, and GUE; however, these encapsulations may require additional incremental work and thus will be specified in separate document(s).”

I think that mentioning other encapsulations (beyond Geneve) is not necessary (and may raise more questions).  IOW, I like Martin’s suggested text more.

OK, I changed the sentence to the following:

“This specification is also applicable to [GENEVE] encapsulation; however, some incremental work is required which will be covered in a separate document [EVPN-GENEVE].”

In either case, at least add an Informative reference to draft-boutros-bess-evpn-geneve.

Done.

Cheers,

Ali

Thanks!

Alvaro.