Re: [bess] IPR call for draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-03 (3/4 to 3/10) - Prior to adoption of CAR/CT solutions

[Susan Hares <[e-mail]>]

IDR and BESS: 

 

In  my message to DJ, I used IETF “slang” 

in the phrase “candidate for adoption in IDR”. 

The translation of this phrase is: IDR WG is discussing the draft

draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-03.txt for adoption in IDR.  

 

The IDR WG is also discussing the draft draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-classful-transport-planes 

for adoption in IDR. 

 

This slang comes from the status line you will now see posted next to each draft. 

draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-03.txt 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car/

and 

draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-classful-transport-planes-13.txt 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-classful-transport-planes/

 

I am the shepherd during the adoption process for both drafts. 

 

Our discussion regarding these two drafts is on the IDR list. 

Jeff posed two questions to the authors on behalf of the IDR chairs 

to kick off this adoption call discussion. 

 

Question 1: BGP routes with color, How does route resolution work with your feature?

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/OaNnE5epcaK7GtcV8OlAVdD3ZbI/

 

Question 2: BGP routes with color, Question 2: Route origination and propagation

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/4MYIFyHWITj8-Kk38AmKlkhh5b8/

 

Kaliraj also added to this discussion on this email on IDR: 

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/_RB9Md01RXUPQ5g-8hzOfJPhT7k/

 

DJ and his co-authors may also send information prior to IETF. 

 

The IDR agenda for IETF 113 includes time for a discussion on these drafts. 

 

After all IPR statements have been submitted and the IETF 113 discussion, 

we will start the formal adoption call. 

 

Cheers, Sue 

 

 

 

From: Susan Hares [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Monday, March 7, 2022 8:33 AM
To: 'Dhananjaya Rao (dhrao)'
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [bess] IPR call for draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-03 (3/4 to 3/10) - Prior to adoption of CAR/CT solutions

 

DJ:

 

IDR is process the adoption of the BGP CAR draft.  

And your adoption request at the interim is sufficient.  

I have listed draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-03.txt as a candidate for adoption in IDR. 

 

Since you first denoted as a BESS draft, it is polite to send email 

last Friday to BESS and IDR WGs, and wait a few days. 

 

I’m sure both WG will be interested in the reviewing these drafts. 

 

Sue 

 

From: Dhananjaya Rao (dhrao) [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Monday, March 7, 2022 7:03 AM
To: Susan Hares; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [bess] IPR call for draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-03 (3/4 to 3/10) - Prior to adoption of CAR/CT solutions

 

Hello Sue,

 

I’m not aware of any IPR.

 

On a related note, we had requested adoption of the BGP CAR draft at the IDR interim on Jan 24. Would you want us to send another email for it, or would this note suffice ?

 

Regards,

-Dhananjaya

 

From: BESS <[e-mail]> on behalf of Susan Hares <[e-mail]>
Date: Friday, March 4, 2022 at 1:24 AM
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>rg>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: [bess] IPR call for draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-03 (3/4 to 3/10) - Prior to adoption of CAR/CT solutions

 

Greetings Bess and IDR:

 

The IDR chairs request that each of the authors of 

draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-03.txt. 

submit an IPR statement in response to this email.  

The motivation for this IPR call is below. 

 

We expect IPR responses from the authors: 

Dhananjaya Rao, Swadesh Agrawal, Clarence Filsfils, 

 Ketan Talaulikar, Dirk Steinberg, Luay Jalil,

Yuanchao Su, Bruno Decraene, Jim Guichard,

Keyur Patel, Haibo Wang

 

There is one  IPR filed against this draft: 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4844/

Motivation for IPR call 

==========================

Why are the IDR calling for IPR statements? 

The authors of draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-classful-transport-planes-13.txt 

have asked for WG Adoption.  

 

We have two drafts that are discussing embedded NLRI (color). 

draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-03.txt 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car/

and 

draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-classful-transport-planes-13.txt 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-classful-transport-planes/

 

Since the IDR chairs know these drafts may overlap,   

we expect to work closely with the bess-chairs, spring-chairs,  

IDR WG, and BESS WG any WG adoption  and WG LC.    

 

Other Discussions 

==================

IDR WG held an interim on 1/24/2022 that discussed these two drafts:  

The minutes are at: 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-idr-02/materials/minutes-interim-2022-idr-02-202201241000-01

 

 

Jeff has started two mail threads for CAR/CT drafts based on 2 Questions: 

Question 1: BGP routes with color, Question 1: How does route resolution work with your feature?

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/OaNnE5epcaK7GtcV8OlAVdD3ZbI/

 

Question 2: BGP routes with color, Question 2: Route origination and propagation

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/4MYIFyHWITj8-Kk38AmKlkhh5b8/

 

Kaliraj began discussion on this email on IDR: 

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/_RB9Md01RXUPQ5g-8hzOfJPhT7k/

 

The BESS email discussion regarding CAR (11/18/2021 to 1/24/2022) can be found at:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/_9oTLaod7z9o_1SYEai0tN5b0EM/

 

 

Sue Hares 

IDR chair 

Document Shepherd