Re: [bess] question to draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04

Luc André Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 22 January 2020 02:02 UTC

Return-Path: <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235CC1200C3; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:02:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3YmlQEkO2-Fm; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:02:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAB8F12002F; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id c16so4679937oic.3; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:02:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :accept-language:content-language:mime-version; bh=zD1vixjLXECXTfpjLncksCaKe+8RJ44o0bcpflq89xM=; b=L48fKvvmqaE9akYXGSOED+NJGR1Fi5gh7h1IONdF9R1uNGBL5Og68vlcdnFDOylQ16 mR1bk6PzO7wixoplcLOqwHYkKTLs8oweDOhI3154Cf04WcZiHbEf3TFZJmAkzbldRKTS i5eQ4tf79RRF54703YVfc8S1/TxRlSHWCFkXNgZdpY1jrwvwJY7y2Tm+WpqWwm5C8Scb r1/wFf71E2schEk2l1yRwLCAgCW8er9fVMIek9bZwLjOELNd4Q5lZhnIHQZARLJrFwH7 wVGto6FaioALu+WJjYCYiMJaWXQ4Ljl+X2To7JMT9YFHXhd0Fry9NGzsb9N1pmlEZAqY CMdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:accept-language:content-language:mime-version; bh=zD1vixjLXECXTfpjLncksCaKe+8RJ44o0bcpflq89xM=; b=glovbwCiT5di7AfLupjTz+oM3mqqBYM/oiWDveVLFqLkQwZ06mVuhyZfyk2aE2TKnc bBkVHmdBIokE/2C/Fj/hXC9y4QbXhkhwQYl+wYz5o5wstj+IK/qAxGiWpQM0oxSvoG0J CckUK7e+vxQALY33DN3P8UY9KdmEwqms8p/5+njDf4IKVHqbA9I3ilUXoVeWoROw6Isw 9IUbcIDlfLWoUQsqor/G3mIEhXMS1J668GK+F1TkhYk+/nAqv7pwE+RNoj+6yaeCRRbl MZmSvxiJ40ZKfgy9sA4ImsdtdmVDTHOw0n2AVXxr9y8OeO6N1pZjHMab04bzzqx9IyzT wuNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXJT995WCDIxPAA/QWzIDmo89RLONF8DhhWSonS6yINt4sWdM+z VZoKq6eEH/oQY1V4WYZMzkmT+kpXijY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxKsmHlGg9D4m8gbuDgmTfTCt1vGlCFeTawL+C4dd4wYP8mLIi3HLZ6nqKdybP2DbhH/yUkNg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:181:: with SMTP id w1mr4652138oic.176.1579658520175; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BY5PR10MB4291.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:307:4087::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u17sm9293553otk.32.2020.01.21.18.01.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:01:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Luc André Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa@ietf.org" <draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa@ietf.org>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] question to draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04
Thread-Index: AQHV0MftwVi3c7lZPkSzsUf+06A2Tw==
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 02:01:58 +0000
Message-ID: <BY5PR10MB4291597ED3A60FEEF85A90F8AF0C0@BY5PR10MB4291.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY5PR10MB4291597ED3A60FEEF85A90F8AF0C0BY5PR10MB4291namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/awfNKM7Zg-1F4CZ55vAvvKXTUkA>
Subject: Re: [bess] question to draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 02:02:03 -0000

Hi Linda,

No, it is not the same as Active-Active.
Since the whole Port is Non-DF and in Blocking state the CE must not ECMP towards both PEs. The ECMP at CE is disabled via a LAG-member OOS/Down notification from the non-DF PE. Only I1 and I2 links carry traffic.

Will add “Designated Forwarder” definition.

Regards,
Luc André Burdet |  Cisco  |  laburdet.ietf@gmail.com  |  Tel: +1 613 254 4814


From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 17:01
To: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>, "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa@ietf.org" <draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa@ietf.org>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] question to draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04

Authors of draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa:

Is “Port-Active” same as “Active-Active”?
Using your Figure 1 as the example, “Port-Active” means that both I1 and I2 links carry traffic, but each <ES > choose one PE as Designated Forwarder?
I assume DF meaning Designated Forwarder? Can you add the acronym?

I support the WG adoption, with the hope that the authors will address the questions above.

Cheers,
Linda Dunbar

From: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com<mailto:matthew.bocci@nokia.com>>
Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 6:48 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>>
Cc: "draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa@ietf.org<mailto:draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa@ietf.org>" <draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa@ietf.org<mailto:draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa@ietf.org>>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:bess-chairs@ietf.org>" <bess-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:bess-chairs@ietf.org>>
Subject: WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
Resent-To: <pbrisset@cisco.com<mailto:pbrisset@cisco.com>>, Cisco Employee <sajassi@cisco.com<mailto:sajassi@cisco.com>>, <bin_wen@comcast.com<mailto:bin_wen@comcast.com>>, <edward.leyton@verizonwireless.com<mailto:edward.leyton@verizonwireless.com>>, <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 6:48 AM

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Tuesday 4th February 2020.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa/<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa%2F&data=02%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C2968334aa9214e12991a08d79ea347f2%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637152296437774545&sdata=ZNLLg%2Fqy2%2BV61VIaUthyQmzr5b58doXh3qMl2gJiiJ8%3D&reserved=0>