[bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7543 (5258)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 08 February 2018 12:51 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BBC12D957 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 04:51:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qqE-VYM5H0EO for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 04:51:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5182912D882 for <bess@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 04:51:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D8E7AB812CA; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 04:51:24 -0800 (PST)
To: hj2387@att.com, luay.jalil@verizon.com, rbonica@juniper.net, keyupate@cisco.com, lucy.yong@huawei.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, stephane.litkowski@orange.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: alexander.vainshtein@ecitele.com, bess@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180208125124.D8E7AB812CA@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 04:51:24 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/b2p1ye_RW9Cs8Tp0IaLpDVFlMz0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 04:54:05 -0800
Subject: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7543 (5258)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 12:51:44 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7543, "Covering Prefixes Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5258 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Alexander ("Sasha") Vainshtein <alexander.vainshtein@ecitele.com> Section: Section 5 Original Text ------------- The UMR is characterized as follows: o EVPN Route Type is equal to MAC/IP Advertisement Route o MAC address length is equal to 0 o IP address length is equal to 0 Corrected Text -------------- In Section 5: The UMR is characterized as follows: o EVPN Route Type is equal to MAC/IP Advertisement Route o MAC address length is equal to 48 o IP address length is equal to 0 Notes ----- The original text provides conflicting definitions of the MAC Address Length in the Unknown MAC Route (UMR). Since the UMR is a MAC/IP Advertisement Route defined in RFC 7432, and since this RFC states that the MAC Address Length in these routes is 48, the text in Section 5 should be corrected to match RFC 7432 as well as the text in Section 1 of this RFC (where MAC Address Length in the UMR is correctly defined as 48). Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7543 (draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Covering Prefixes Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4 Publication Date : May 2015 Author(s) : H. Jeng, L. Jalil, R. Bonica, K. Patel, L. Yong Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : BGP Enabled Services Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7543 (5258) RFC Errata System