Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8053127444; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:36:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=gyGLnsx0; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=CARdpARe Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ghSPhjOBUipX; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:36:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E301200B9; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:36:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2476B208B8; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:36:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:36:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=fkmLttcS/zIIt70ZzirwdIJ9N0Raizxg3tkqNm+6gfM=; b=gyGLnsx0 MQxfy1CbYyuE59VyQGVv5X23I6W7fVNT1HMKR4GLBYIRnvwSPUu7acSOH7ftSjW+ ig1A9LxLa/+mL7jHgmKE0ujJwjNm42w7Wdv0/SuNRIZRbt1oRRkCImMJUUw2BNu1 cxhShPtFYCarJqjOejKEXyn55emFzCw9vuRCc8gLyETBJusUOR6HQ/OSnu1xEiLn 4O8bp5/3OlenIndwE3WBftbJInxQrIWn846tsiK/grRNi0zdk7PhESGPoPkY+QRY CUKlM4kA+dMaIZBNtV1rb8xmmO7C494TUPdPnnRfxzD+86SYfuykL2CVaL8VgnpM BZs3QxYZHm+eGA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=fkmLttcS/zIIt70ZzirwdIJ9N0Rai zxg3tkqNm+6gfM=; b=CARdpARe269/1WCcSL+5aE5ZC05WFhRbmsAN5i0mUHkcQ gPHbtI+s1ReWW60/FN7qtiuUVLsqH1I7apyF9AezTYVW7RnzsOEEai9nXoBHavw6 4vq/PP6a/F033CwpgeeSbxRWFjXD64VOGPQ0uL+6Wbhatp/fSsACYi8MLcAFzqta k/6MdDJ/WLVIKQqw0mBf2pp84T7nAv7yAz421MytOOdttHh6qYf87ShyS8Itm4hN 8snWh5WJBOYVXIWChTBooAg/yMf7di/B+iNie59p9zpcS/6134ocKqB1i4P21+mX vOcjjINjWz8pS9dlhS0j6qcpLCxehnebLIdr3/1SA== X-ME-Sender: Received: from sjc-alcoop-8812.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.179]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 942E47E353; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:36:27 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4F40058C-99E0-4416-9356-6FF05C3AFEDB" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Alissa Cooper In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:36:25 -0500 Cc: Vijay Gurbani , draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay.all@ietf.org, gen-art , bess@ietf.org Message-Id: <51D8A817-72C5-4C3F-8493-521452B58A26@cooperw.in> References: <151386581037.12921.16380046165179697315@ietfa.amsl.com> To: Alvaro Retana X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:36:32 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_4F40058C-99E0-4416-9356-6FF05C3AFEDB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Vijay, thanks for your review. Authors, thanks for addressing Vijay=E2=80=99= s comment. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Dec 22, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Alvaro Retana = wrote: >=20 > Vijay: >=20 > Hi! >=20 > Thanks for your review! >=20 > The registry has a FCFS registration policy, so at some point in the = life of draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay the code points were requested =E2=80=94= not necessarily in the draft itself. >=20 > Even though draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay is tagged in the datatracker = to have replaced draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay, I think you make a good = point in that the registry needs to be updated with the current/correct = information. >=20 > Authors: Please add a note in the IANA Considerations Section to have = the reference in the registry point to this document. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Alvaro. >=20 > On December 21, 2017 at 9:16:53 AM, Vijay Gurbani (vkg@acm.org = ) wrote: >=20 >> Minor issues:=20 >> In S13 (IANA Considerations), I am not sure whether this draft is = allocating=20 >> the tunnel types or not. The responsible IANA registry [0] shows that = the=20 >> tunnel types mentioned in this draft are already allocated through a = precursor=20 >> individual draft [1], which has long expired. However, when I look at = the IANA=20 >> Consideration section in [1], it is empty! So I am not sure how the = IANA=20 >> registry in [0] received the allocations. I think the IANA section of = this=20 >> draft needs to be updated accordingly.=20 >>=20 >> [0]=20 >> = https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters/bgp-parameters.xhtml#tunne= l-types = =20 >> [1] http://www.iana.org/go/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay = (the expired = individual=20 >> draft itself is at = https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03 = )=20 >>=20 > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art = --Apple-Mail=_4F40058C-99E0-4416-9356-6FF05C3AFEDB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Vijay, thanks for your review. Authors, = thanks for addressing Vijay=E2=80=99s comment. I have entered a No = Objection ballot.

Alissa

On Dec 22, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Alvaro Retana = <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

Vijay:

Hi!

Thanks for your review!

The registry has a FCFS registration = policy, so at some point in the life of draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay = the code points were requested =E2=80=94 not necessarily in the draft = itself.

Even though = draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay is tagged in the datatracker to have = replaced draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay, I think you make a good point in = that the registry needs to be updated with the current/correct = information.

Authors: =  Please add a note in the IANA Considerations Section to have the = reference in the registry point to this document.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On December 21, 2017 at 9:16:53 AM, Vijay Gurbani (vkg@acm.org) = wrote:

Minor issues: 
In S13 (IANA Considerations), I am not sure = whether this draft is allocating 
the tunnel types or not. The responsible IANA = registry [0] shows that the 
tunnel types mentioned in this draft are already = allocated through a precursor 
individual draft [1], which has long expired. = However, when I look at the IANA 
Consideration section in [1], it is empty! So I = am not sure how the IANA 
registry in [0] received the allocations. I = think the IANA section of this 
draft needs to be updated accordingly. 

[0] 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters/bgp-parameters.= xhtml#tunnel-types 
[1] http://www.iana.org/go/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay (the expired = individual 
draft itself is at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03<= span style=3D"font-variant-caps: normal; letter-spacing: normal; = text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: = normal; word-spacing: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); float: = none; display: inline !important;" class=3D"">) 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

= --Apple-Mail=_4F40058C-99E0-4416-9356-6FF05C3AFEDB--