IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Mon, 08 May 2017 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AD81296C9; Mon, 8 May 2017 12:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y_9Yo8-NwoiX; Mon, 8 May 2017 12:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECC40124D37; Mon, 8 May 2017 12:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1040; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1494272990; x=1495482590; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=OgZP5wFsioPNG1VV/1OzHVSeVqZb4LzRDZRTOH3LVZo=; b=NJ+bqHMEvxDoY33m/htfXBqXMwlFNNvjp9ou+4LzEQtzqnxrzqVYeHdO +GzHKkmDjN5fJYCcXeBhOW8GWe0nXWklFtJ1kHZ7jDqOs+B66oc1PlEpY 5ovcrWLyFqqwc1HoJzBosX0izPPrb/S2GsAc8RhsPe81tmGxHrOoySzEk c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C8AQAGyxBZ/5pdJa1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBg1WBbgeDYYoYkTaWE4IPhiQCGoRLPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWBiMRRRACAQgaAh8HAgICMBUQAgQBDQWKILNjgiaKdQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2BC4VUgV4rC4JlhGODCi6CEh8BBJZmhxMBkxeCBIU8iiyIfItBAR84gQpwFVgBhRaBSnaHXoENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,310,1491264000"; d="scan'208";a="24773882"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2017 19:49:48 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v48Jnm2l031132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 8 May 2017 19:49:49 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 8 May 2017 14:49:48 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 8 May 2017 14:49:48 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, "draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject.all@ietf.org>
CC: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHSxji99stFecQnLU2C/b5WAbJ/26Hn6riAgAMCGIA=
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 19:49:48 +0000
Message-ID: <AF52B605-6542-4E18-AF74-E51F62B59256@cisco.com>
References: <CA+b+ERkVdsmcfVQ+9rA0VjBsceh10nCegwvoSuR_A9E-8fZn2Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iJUkWp+np=1dD__5mkoHnscVP6eWmYGA5CE7gHtQ7pruw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJUkWp+np=1dD__5mkoHnscVP6eWmYGA5CE7gHtQ7pruw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <098051FF8144AC4996D4DE425A25D814@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/bkVha0Td808uKyNST6EBN9JGLh8>
Subject: Re: [bess] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 19:49:52 -0000

Hi!

The way I see it, the change proposed in this document is a change to the base BGP spec – as such, many/all users of BGP will be affected.  I expect bess participants to also participate in idr – I don’t see the need to extend the discussion.

Alvaro.


On 5/6/17, 1:53 PM, "Warren Kumari" <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

>
>The group of users of BGP which this update impacts the most are members
>of BESS WG (cc-ed) and not IDR WG due to the fact that this proposal applies
>to all AFI/SAFIs.

I'll happily admit that I have not been following BESS at all, and so
know very little of what y'all do ("Hi Bess!"). Alvaro, please advise
if BESS is affected to the level that they should have been explicitly
invited to comment?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email