Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc
slitkows.ietf@gmail.com Wed, 13 October 2021 07:28 UTC
Return-Path: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9BF3A0E0A;
Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id EOjX9G6Ormnn; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 176C23A14EC;
Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id g8so6175863edt.7;
Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id
:mime-version:thread-index:content-language;
bh=wwoWqPUDDBEqchuihULOAl5IXWyn4oAkQKuyueo44So=;
b=bjECgHwDr6sjbDrG/84mNKq4zofm9n7ZTiZLZbkjU4UN1lpwXTFS/BbLOAN0v65ma8
3o24I9Jk7YWg0j1E8Whc9i93DXt0kzJjabSh2L4otSct78orkjBlein7mo85NR9kKCqO
1DKObzEk+SVvtZFzz2tgxC/WmKisUSS4LTfPxU1oNyw4XQlNj4Df6ZnvlfRj01GT19AP
5GWv55sgt7Bnr1j2DEGvqgfTFBR8LKWfgjJ/hHhVb/K9yORVLWiZ7f57kzW+Jrf4Sl7g
2lIVf1inYD19TPJSGQJ09pCogiZJBsXfOWlCgofhTULS471f4xYUtFtLoT+jit6aoGmQ
yCXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date
:message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language;
bh=wwoWqPUDDBEqchuihULOAl5IXWyn4oAkQKuyueo44So=;
b=X+JPdSOk811T8jJBU7fBlNO8DzSevBhCyMKgx47Rto+bAYotTE4GuiH5GwXPhtWfq9
WxgXYgUWisGpheybcblBT3UTkpVF2plusQvoluBoaDhDAvSt+8W9bZVwrGoKYiDaj8IQ
9qUQutjD3Zm1xGL/Jc/VZRDUWJPNHoii/DyUx6pX5TXWV0tw07iXdGaCAlLCYo+2kygm
fkHJcEVJtrMWbdRPQRdyXSnpAFWzMAsumkXziJ9Eq5JsvMuvta0IzwJ93v3t9E38cZ7m
YHHG6+sbQ7kCqSuBkt7kTtGbBDk2j7s2SYk/izi+XZer/wXCK3wDBw81aeqyACstrmep
+dtw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nJtHztPnCsMxR2/MQgETMfbV3npLQDS4vi2fHycuvw6yo7gvG
NF6PgnkmcNdtYX0M0glRcl1k02aYCg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfa2P48t34qCOD4WFbiepR1ofjLi11cSf5LZWVLFuVIOxpBztj85GggQGS1jrQZ/euFMxPWw==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c941:: with SMTP id h1mr7281028edt.128.1634110086124;
Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CSCOWPF2QW8Y3 ([173.38.220.47])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k23sm7213301edv.22.2021.10.13.00.28.03
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "'BESS'" <bess@ietf.org>,
"Ali Sajassi \(sajassi\)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
Cc: <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <010901d7b42e$6b3c7ae0$41b570a0$@gmail.com>
<603307F7-2AB2-4B3D-A6C4-6065E945B1E6@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <603307F7-2AB2-4B3D-A6C4-6065E945B1E6@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:28:02 +0200
Message-ID: <062101d7c003$dbce3c40$936ab4c0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0622_01D7C014.A027A2B0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHGjdJwRG0yp7W8bHGECQXkieCpMQE+gkIUq+j3vHA=
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/eZB0MWp77IvTcWKZjfEUASPgwVw>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call,
IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>,
<mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>,
<mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 07:28:13 -0000
Hi folks, We are missing IPR poll reply from Ali. We’ll proceed to the next step as soon as we clear the IPR poll. Brgds, Stephane From: Patrice Brissette (pbrisset) <pbrisset@cisco.com> Sent: jeudi 30 septembre 2021 01:34 To: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com; 'BESS' <bess@ietf.org> Cc: bess-chairs@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc Hi, As co-author, I support this draft. I’m not aware of IPR other than the 2 mentioned below. Regards, Patrice Brissette, Principal Engineer Cisco Systems http://e-vpn.io http://go2.cisco.com/evpn From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org> > on behalf of "slitkows.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> " <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at 02:03 To: 'BESS' <bess@ietf.org <mailto:bess@ietf.org> > Cc: "bess-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:bess-chairs@ietf.org> " <bess-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:bess-chairs@ietf.org> > Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc Hi, This email starts a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc [1] Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a Standards Track RFC. This poll runs until the 12th October 2021. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from all the authors and contributors. There are currently two IPR disclosures. In addition, we are polling for knowledge of implementations of this draft, per the BESS policy in [2]. Thank you, Matthew & Stephane [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc/ [2] <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
- [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll … slitkows.ietf
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation P… John E Drake
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation P… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation P… Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [bess] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: WG Last Call, IPR a… Boutros, Sami
- Re: [bess] [**EXTERNAL**] WG Last Call, IPR and I… Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [bess] [**EXTERNAL**] WG Last Call, IPR and I… UTTARO, JAMES
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation P… Luc André Burdet
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation P… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation P… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation P… Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation P… slitkows.ietf
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation P… Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
- Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation P… Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: [bess] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: WG Last Call, IPR a… Boutros, Sami
- Re: [bess] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: WG Last Call, IPR a… slitkows.ietf