IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] Question on split horizon label for EVPN VPWS Multi homing

"Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com> Mon, 13 May 2019 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06419120094 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 07:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QTS3Gw-q8-_0 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 07:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur01on0707.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe1f::707]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A4A8120044 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 07:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=nuaZDXgUAWXRE5bR2FjjJAhs8A5SYq4RiVkWN1nrnM8=; b=TXtu5bGCHbQ5gEHUkAhaCwtFjDWFFiPL+IIvzsEr24S3ceW/uz5flw5T/rjZTo2biuhhkPgVt04xL/wCGCdeVIv/KTJ1DMmm4r4SbszcuvAHVuy4TmP7/w/r7UUmMHdFxtLdCJkzF1HP0AAdEkzMOS3LCSjI/iCfABwMUJ5uiJk=
Received: from AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.134.82.20) by AM0PR07MB5972.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.115.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1900.8; Mon, 13 May 2019 14:57:31 +0000
Received: from AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d71:53c3:a423:7890]) by AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d71:53c3:a423:7890%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1900.010; Mon, 13 May 2019 14:57:31 +0000
From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
To: gangadhara reddy chavva <meetgangadhara@gmail.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] Question on split horizon label for EVPN VPWS Multi homing
Thread-Index: AQHVCXgx6uhAJVH/zESrhaeXmqtPd6ZpRvYA
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 14:57:31 +0000
Message-ID: <F90DA2B2-858C-43BF-84B5-6B20DA99BFB6@nokia.com>
References: <CAAG_SC_Yk2qaTq4fORa4PbupGmWBc9frs9eps0m0S_-GyZgrwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAG_SC9hQk242DyhOkUu-VzcG1aDVjx0eAFQtqsEVbaM3rWQmQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAG_SC9hQk242DyhOkUu-VzcG1aDVjx0eAFQtqsEVbaM3rWQmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.19.0.190502
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jorge.rabadan@nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [135.245.20.2]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d916fc1e-4000-48a9-f45b-08d6d7b35316
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:AM0PR07MB5972;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB5972:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR07MB5972DF1CD3A33CDB4B068169F70F0@AM0PR07MB5972.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0036736630
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(73956011)(8936002)(76116006)(91956017)(9326002)(64756008)(33656002)(66556008)(66476007)(6486002)(66446008)(81156014)(8676002)(66946007)(229853002)(81166006)(256004)(82746002)(68736007)(2501003)(6246003)(5660300002)(7736002)(25786009)(83716004)(71200400001)(71190400001)(6436002)(66066001)(53936002)(6306002)(54896002)(3846002)(236005)(6512007)(102836004)(6506007)(26005)(110136005)(478600001)(6116002)(790700001)(2906002)(53546011)(2616005)(476003)(486006)(446003)(58126008)(186003)(316002)(606006)(86362001)(14454004)(36756003)(11346002)(966005)(99286004)(76176011)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM0PR07MB5972; H:AM0PR07MB3844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: hpvNg7CNY/LRyEOq8hUJdnaD5mjeDKmxQjhbu3GsyMlYWfj4GsrQDdy1HhsAcDyFt7GShD//uZyOYZ6QpjFG7v936RzzU/YCZWwxfCxJF0GZSwcNXZmHa3pz6bUzCKcr2yKS0tw/XgVOxnx+W/+92vDIR38ZKhNum3HbXCZgXRmHn4Jst8yTRQ8Av0YaLCVStssjzirksGMXVYrn2YNOhbgkpeubXPbcc9/Nod1AB/RQaBJVC2HwGDIFP0tk3uC1U28igq6PbwYXdRcYAIdTcQywe6hWL/k0K7+t8Ycs5EVvXJn8xaQIKhCQUGiX1lWXIn0axh+k89Ligi6ebD/mislE1avHqTJxPLrPmtl3Sno4kPeaxFEsfpUHN8Zxuuit7/EiAY3YUVn3CimqeF30J//75X9t6YtQw3vv9FgoGhM=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F90DA2B2858C43BF84B56B20DA99BFB6nokiacom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d916fc1e-4000-48a9-f45b-08d6d7b35316
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 May 2019 14:57:31.1245 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB5972
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/fOjs-kE3w49jtHp0AvDG4j4KZ58>
Subject: Re: [bess] Question on split horizon label for EVPN VPWS Multi homing
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 14:57:37 -0000

Hi,

Remember that the same ES can be shared by Eline, ELAN, Etree and other EVPN services, in which you still need the ESI label. So I would follow RFC7432 for this.
On reception a PE should ignore the ESI label value if only EVPN VPWS services are running.

As a side note, this document is trying to clarify that the ESI label may be zero if no ESI-label based split-horizon is used:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nr-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-00

Thx
Jorge

From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of gangadhara reddy chavva <meetgangadhara@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, May 13, 2019 at 12:39 PM
To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] Question on split horizon label for EVPN VPWS Multi homing

Hi,

section 3.1 of EVPN VPWS rfc 8214 specify's the usage of EAD per ES route and ESI label extended community for EVPN VPWS. it is not very clear on what should sender fill in the ESI label field for EVPN VPWS multi homing. as there is no concept of flooding and split horizon procedures are not applicable for VPWS.. please clarify on this.

Regards,
Gangadhar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email