IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] [Idr] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay vs. draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps

"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 07:05 UTC

Return-Path: <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8427D12B05A; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OvVjk8lWjMEX; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2DE912DC93; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4163; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464073504; x=1465283104; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=MvFqDCCCrZythjYULMjAVNpua+WgftkCbCUEQp+3gIs=; b=ge0sewN2EZOBkNV2VJ6hl1k6hkYe4QtsYoNOAI68v7KfSV6dMy8jLeVC Pff0JgDHvd13i/cnck1enDi08HPDuL/n28gEbhautN2rUyM5Sr1s8Jkfg 3aJLrOkvvDaFibfg0zuefypEBmUfI5A87tWVNEKlj5+2cwuHZ/UA1zjYe o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BPAgDt/ENX/5hdJa1bgmxLVoEDtH6EeQENgXYihW8CgTA4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RDAQEEgQkCAQgEQjIlAgQBiEEOxCEBAQEBAQEBAQIBAQEBAQEBAQEZBYpzihkFjh2KGgGFf4ggjxyPSwEeAQFCg22JQH8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,359,1459814400"; d="scan'208,217";a="105753673"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 May 2016 07:04:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (xch-rtp-005.cisco.com [64.101.220.145]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4O74sqa012658 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 May 2016 07:04:54 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 24 May 2016 03:04:54 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 24 May 2016 03:04:53 -0400
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange.com>, IDR <idr@ietf.org>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay@tools.ietf.org>, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay vs. draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps
Thread-Index: AQHRpi++kmVRnOfCCEaLlUJwLCbjV5+pXciAgAAV74CAABx8AIAAAd6AgAD40oCAAAcLgIAAlB8AgAAObQCAE5+SgIAAQjEAgAiAQYA=
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:04:53 +0000
Message-ID: <D369475E.1A2CD7%sajassi@cisco.com>
References: <5729F1C3.1030605@orange.com> <5729F7C5.6040604@orange.com> <52D35106-ED5E-4C95-9131-6EA4527370D5@alcatel-lucent.com> <BY2PR0501MB1702CD2423A817F3725CB5DFC77B0@BY2PR0501MB1702.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <012C176C-A8D6-45AA-BA69-616C0ED7E41E@alcatel-lucent.com> <SN1PR0501MB1709E1AF8C398791421E2123C77B0@SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <420BA2D8D80A6727.2B2C290F-2299-40BB-B53B-CC36D2B5D826@mail.outlook.com> <1881_1462451514_572B3D3A_1881_7198_1_0vn90oitr7e881gh2sn8qm5f.1462451509961@email.android.com> <SN1PR0501MB17099CA0122BA8B4C3F99E7EC77C0@SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <17029_1462484835_572BBF63_17029_2323_1_opi9hqsl9b9tani0t0skkcuq.1462484831251@email.android.com> <SN1PR0501MB170976E947BEABC8FD591ED8C77C0@SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <28175_1463566739_573C4192_28175_2444_1_613f729b-d12e-5c48-29a1-ff000c1184a1@orange.com> <SN1PR0501MB17090A6F0AC5D3D447E21C28C7490@SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0501MB17090A6F0AC5D3D447E21C28C7490@SN1PR0501MB1709.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.2.160219
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.116.190]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D369475E1A2CD7sajassiciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/hFhN0UD27bD64kUzj5a91RxxFB0>
Subject: Re: [bess] [Idr] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay vs. draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:05:06 -0000

Folks,

I have updated and published rev03 of even-overlay draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay/

The main changes are:

  1.  section 10.2 - DCI using ASBR
  2.  The setting of Ethernet tag and VNI fields - there were some inconsistencies in different sections. Section 5.1.3 captures the setting of these fields for different type of services in pretty good details. All other sections were cleaned up and now refer to section 5.1.3.

Thomas,
The draft is ready for its long-overdue WG LC considering how long its has been around and its multi-vendor implementation status.

Regards,
Ali

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email