Re: [bess] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

<> Wed, 16 August 2017 10:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BDD132320; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 03:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y2oZ0a0pkkRd; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 03:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A6F9132113; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 03:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown [xx.xx.xx.9]) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 8A42010068B; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:19:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.69]) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 6C2ACC0082; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:19:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from l-fipglop ( by OPEXCLILMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ( with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.361.1; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:19:50 +0200
Message-ID: <>
To: Ravi Singh <>, "" <>
CC: "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:19:50 +0200
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Organization: Orange S.A.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: []
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [bess] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:19:54 -0000

Hi Ravi,

Many thanks for this review.

One question below...

Ravi Singh, 2017-08-16 06:56:
> The only major comments pertain to
> a.       Sections 5.2/8.1: which appear like an overkill and could be
> considered for dropping from text.

Can you expand on why you this this is overkill ?

Thank you,



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.