Re: [bess] Regd. DF Election Notes
Wen Lin <wlin@juniper.net> Mon, 25 January 2016 14:43 UTC
Return-Path: <wlin@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462461B2B37 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 06:43:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hbl7x5ba1IjS for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 06:43:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0104.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C4051B2B07 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 06:43:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.200.139) by BY1PR0501MB1239.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.200.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.365.19; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:43:01 +0000
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.200.139]) by BY1PR0501MB1240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.200.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0365.024; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:43:01 +0000
From: Wen Lin <wlin@juniper.net>
To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] Regd. DF Election Notes
Thread-Index: AQHRV36wLBTaSxjkaUGDhnTJEICEUQ==
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:43:01 +0000
Message-ID: <D2CB9E50.6ED1C%wlin@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=wlin@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY1PR0501MB1239; 5:fDBnpY4DW9+NypEylCaptfdWwY2xwfXMLh1FtAtoqtHxWSi06sGdOWu4FOecg/7yfMgM//8JAE83rHOm5ZcPXJVCv+5btsQhUtpiaAnjqEukYb2NzHlDxodnrQdykj22n/M7+Yr+2VfkOKE+lOxjCw==; 24:KZpNFTF/Cj/RruOVtKQRpiFlwN8spfs99nJqCA3am00FmMQOUDyvk0nDE/PF/H3ZAv8tuYb1/UlRFRS7QzR8jEGnwRYU7G6LiaoQc0oP+RI=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1239;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 47cc44be-9d59-4bb4-4243-08d32595d358
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY1PR0501MB1239969BA8043DD6A123CB5BC8C70@BY1PR0501MB1239.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(61489475475257)(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(520078)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1239; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1239;
x-forefront-prvs: 083289FD26
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(479174004)(377454003)(24454002)(164054003)(189002)(199003)(5001960100002)(15975445007)(3846002)(54356999)(1096002)(110136002)(102836003)(1220700001)(77096005)(2900100001)(107886002)(2351001)(11100500001)(106356001)(105586002)(50986999)(5002640100001)(106116001)(5008740100001)(3280700002)(586003)(66066001)(97736004)(16236675004)(4001350100001)(19617315012)(6116002)(81156007)(99286002)(101416001)(189998001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(1730700002)(2906002)(122556002)(87936001)(83506001)(10400500002)(36756003)(450100001)(2501003)(5004730100002)(40100003)(86362001)(92566002)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1239; H:BY1PR0501MB1240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2CB9E506ED1Cwlinjunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Jan 2016 14:43:01.4565 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0501MB1239
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/iWlSKm09ky5AG1OdL5uommKic0w>
Subject: Re: [bess] Regd. DF Election Notes
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:43:09 -0000
+1 Thanks, Wen From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com<mailto:wim.henderickx@nokia.com>> Date: Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 9:47 AM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [bess] Regd. DF Election Notes Support, since this enhances the DF election for EVPN On 1/11/16, 1:07 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" <bess-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election-02 [1] as a working group item. Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in the both cases, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until *the 25th of January*. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this document. *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election/ _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>> Date: Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 10:28 PM To: smohanty mohanty <satyamoh@cisco.com<mailto:satyamoh@cisco.com>> Subject: Re: Regd. DF Election Notes Here you go From: "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" Date: Sunday 26 July 2015 08:07 To: Wim Henderickx Subject: Regd. DF Election Notes Hi Wim, Good to talk to you at the airport. I am following up on the request to please send me the writeup regarding the various service models sec 6.1 - 6.3. About 2-3 years back you had circulated such a dic. Best would be if you've examples. Thanks, --Satya
- Re: [bess] Regd. DF Election Notes Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [bess] Regd. DF Election Notes Sami Boutros
- Re: [bess] Regd. DF Election Notes Wen Lin
- Re: [bess] Regd. DF Election Notes Antoni Przygienda