Re: [bess] 答复: 答复: Flowspec for L2VPN and E-VPN

It does
Bertrand

Sent from iPAD


> On Nov 14, 2014, at 01:28, Henderickx, Wim (Wim) <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> 
> We define a new AFI/SAFI that accommodates all we have + include L2
> extensions.
> Operators that don’t need L2 extensions keep what they have.
> Operators that need L2 extensions go to the new method or mix the new
> method with the old methods per service type.
> 
> Make sense?
> 
>> On 13/11/14 14:16, "Haoweiguo" <haoweiguo@huawei.com> wrote:
>> 
>> How to achieve compatability with current existed flowspec[RFC5575]
>> applications? 
>> Thanks
>> weiguo
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> 发件人: Henderickx, Wim (Wim) [wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com]
>> 发送时间: 2014年11月14日 8:14
>> 收件人: Haoweiguo; Thomas Morin; BESS
>> 抄送: IDR Chairs
>> 主题: Re: 答复: [bess] Flowspec for L2VPN and E-VPN
>> 
>> If we define a new things I prefer to address the wider issue and include
>> L2 in that.
>> 
>>> On 13/11/14 14:13, "Haoweiguo" <haoweiguo@huawei.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Wim,
>>> Allocating different AFI/SAFI(s) for each flow spec application is a
>>> applicable solution. Theoretically, unified mechanism for all flowspec
>>> can be designed, but it maybe a more harder work in IDR.
>>> Thanks
>>> weiguo
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> 发件人: BESS [bess-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
>>> [wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com]
>>> 发送时间: 2014年11月14日 7:55
>>> 收件人: Thomas Morin; BESS
>>> 抄送: IDR Chairs
>>> 主题: Re: [bess] Flowspec for L2VPN and E-VPN
>>> 
>>> As I stated in the IDR meeting my observation is that we require to many
>>> AFI/SAFI(s) for all flow spec functions. Flow spec in general is
>>> providing
>>> match criteria¹s with related actions. Given the proposal on Flowspec for
>>> L2 is new we should look at the bigger picture.
>>> In My view we need a mechanism in BGP to advertise Flowspec match
>>> criteria¹s with related actions and they should cover L2/L3-IPv4/IPv6.
>>> 
>>>> On 13/11/14 13:44, "Thomas Morin" <thomas.morin@orange.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi WG,
>>>> 
>>>> A heads up...
>>>> 
>>>> These two drafts relate to BESS and thus may be of interest to us:
>>>> - draft-hao-idr-flowspec-l2vpn
>>>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html?draft=draft-hao-idr-flowspec-l2vpn-01> (on
>>>> idr agenda, being presented right now)
>>>> - draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn
>>>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00>
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> 
>>>> -Thomas
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> BESS mailing list
>>>> BESS@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> BESS mailing list
>>> BESS@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess