Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 03 September 2021 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D623A20C2; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 07:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DeeltIv5RTjg; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 07:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAE3E3A20BC; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 07:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id bt14so12558447ejb.3; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 07:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2d6jz69g+m4/TVlBzY4cr8NGEwYs0tflwwOPWHW2RBY=; b=buNS/Tn4M8w8LNlWajkHodMiybmbyaBzslZRAAcu/20o2q0NBj40AXQ0v2x5eq6FDk 9NA5cchqq0NsqkLyImyKcEYxmgvyAal8or+dlGzMrRqbpMMQ02JZFZ8oh0oESdqey0Wz c8H9hJkVDT53IBVQdaweDFkVEk+/mIe9PpSrSTB22FnWoNgvCTkwEKF+1/8QkTVQNB4I gfjiWqT98DNJRjLWVLmF/VNbUepV48dPPEd9IkVXb7U78qmgegzlyaTZRuey1jN+lB1a PQSCINqx7DmrkFvRbBInti7nw15XS0lyXyAw2wXwLnwe3PKilZgXRvZXKI9fBSeN8ml1 9Yyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2d6jz69g+m4/TVlBzY4cr8NGEwYs0tflwwOPWHW2RBY=; b=sxPTBBIb6R9ICtIjlfIakPMkqBjUIIe/KHbPIub5typYNu2rx1k8s6bR9JBS/TNB3G Oa25L7d3J43Fc7v/M9SNly/GJyhZUhCjTJtFJvCQHEYwQxxv276rcpkqSCPBxCtX8YN0 H5rEDJMSmEn9EzD7orG0GLxJ81y4CIankr7sKqtIKgfjn4/NcuKW5vlb1uon6Juzq1tx GREKmgAce2sKtNhs8ThrstRHCWrVh4J646+b2Do6XJjqckqByrVm4DiAUCzdVl3VGS3d ZI7XEop6bEPY06OS9EZx63yhSPg1DJnHBMeNYrlr0Shw7t+f487HeCBV3wLdozs1vmnj zhrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530nQEkyqS/ma8CJWKKcjH+aNyHwvoKeVowAJV1N8busEjLVGUEZ OSYxuNAD63udJa8mZScPNnfzA5n24AvL419UBbs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVGZQZ2IHAe2TA7Z8UmNVUfANd5W25Alsa9tKMhkGQtVt221KouMprAcEE5Pt0uC4yU/UxYVa+uOrT1UhyUOU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:369a:: with SMTP id a26mr4551693ejc.539.1630680063114; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 07:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO1PR05MB8088C1596C134FE2958CF5D1C7CC9@CO1PR05MB8088.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <202109010536357895706@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <202109010536357895706@zte.com.cn>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 07:40:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVsXK=2g83faPokxhhGp4EOVJ1aK9jPeDzzOZqFsESMfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Cc: John E Drake <jdrake=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, sajassi=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping@ietf.org, Greg Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="000000000000e8004c05cb184939"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/jA9ym_EPso2ULioPD2puEW_WjIE>
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 14:41:11 -0000

Hi Matthew and BESS WG,
I was informed that our product does support using most of the sub-TLVs
defined in the draft. Please let me know if you have any further questions
regarding the implementation.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 2:36 PM <gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com> wrote:

> Hi Matthew,
>
> my apologies for the belated response:
>
>    1.
>
>    I am still awaiting a response from our product team on whether any
>    part of the draft is supported.
>    2.
>
>    I concur with Ali. LSP Ping is a broadly used OAM tool detecting and
>    localizing failures, including discrepancies between the data and control
>    planes. The document defines necessary Target FEC sub-TLVs for EVPN and
>    MVPN cases.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg Mirsky
>
>
> Sr. Standardization Expert
> 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
> Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
>
>
>
> E: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com
> www.zte.com.cn
> Original Mail
> *Sender: *JohnEDrake
> *To: *Ali Sajassi (sajassi);Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB);bess@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping@ietf.org;
> *Date: *2021/08/31 11:34
> *Subject: **Re: [bess] Implementation poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05*
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I agree with Ali.
>
>
>
> Yours Irrespectively,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
> *Sent:* Friday, August 27, 2021 9:54 PM
> *To:* Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>om>; bess@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [bess] Implementation poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
>
>
>
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
>
>
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
>
>
> Some of the co-authors are on PTO and I couldn’t reach them (typical of
> the month of August). So, I’d like to get a bit more extension.
>
>
>
> Regarding the two questions below:
>
>    1.
>
>    My company hasn’t implemented it.
>    2.
>
>    I do think that we should process with the publication as it describes
>    how LSP ping can be used to detect data-plane failures for various EVPN
>    functionality including aliasing, split-horizon filtering using ESI label,
>    multicast, l2-unicast, l3-unicast, IRB, etc. For MPLS transport tunnel, I
>    am not aware of any other tool/draft that allows us to do data-plane
>    failure detection. Thus, I think it is important to proceed with its
>    publications.
>
>
>
> Still I’d like to hear from other co-authors and other people in this
> community.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ali
>
>
>
> *From: *Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>
> *Date: *Monday, August 9, 2021 at 6:25 AM
> *To: *bess@ietf.org <bess@ietf.org>rg>,
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping@ietf.org <
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
>
> WG and Authors
>
> Unfortunately I have not seen any responses indicating that there are any
> known implementations of this draft. I also did not see any responses to
> Stephane's question if we should proceed regardless.
>
> As per the BESS WG implementation policy (
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4v8nM3No$>),
> please can you respond to this email indicating either:
>
> - That you are aware of any implementations (ideally providing some
> details)
> - If you are not aware of any, if you think the WG should proceed with the
> draft's publication and why.
>
> I will close this poll on 25th August 2021.
>
> Regards
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 14/06/2021, 17:38, "BESS on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org" <bess-bounces@ietf.org
> on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>
>     A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>     This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
>
>             Title           : LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN and PBB-EVPN
>             Authors         : Parag Jain
>                               Samer Salam
>                               Ali Sajassi
>                               Sami Boutros
>                               Greg Mirsky
>          Filename        : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05.txt
>          Pages           : 15
>          Date            : 2021-06-14
>
>     Abstract:
>        LSP-Ping is a widely deployed Operation, Administration, and
>        Maintenance (OAM) mechanism in MPLS networks.  This document
>        describes mechanisms for detecting data-plane failures using LSP
> Ping
>        in MPLS based EVPN and PBB-EVPN networks.
>
>
>     The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4CFZvJAM$>
>
>     There is also an htmlized version available at:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4RLT2-5Q$>
>
>     A diff from the previous version is available at:
>     https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli44UwE5yg$>
>
>
>     Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>     ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__ftp:/ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4trDqUTY$>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     BESS mailing list
>     BESS@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4YoTqkAc$>
>
>
>