Re: [bess] EVPN FECs in LSP Ping

Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Fri, 21 September 2018 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF36130E4C; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 10:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.789
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=eci365.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7QFAzVeUKaap; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 10:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com [85.158.142.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E791277CC; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 10:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [85.158.142.193] (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) by server-1.bemta.az-b.eu-central-1.aws.symcld.net id 1D/1C-29604-F3425AB5; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:02:55 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA1WSe0hTcRTH/d173W7ljeuWeprZ4/aibGurqGn 0oIiCCCKiInvd5c0t5p3uTlrRQ9LKzKggbNpDjfloZcQ2U1EspdKyMu0FhWiusOxFVkRp0e7u NPvnx+d3vud8z/n9OCSu6JapSM5u46w8a2Zkw4k50V67etGk4gTt4UykL2vMw/X1ldP0LZcr8 MX4iur8dvkKp/MnthrbGGriDRb7tlBje2uNLOXbMvvp86np6Oj8bDScJOiLODS4vhPiRUHnYl BdVx4qXXwILnT55NloGCmjF4D7crtM5FH0FHhfWhiowOlsDAr6SwOCkmagv1O0EpMmQp37iFz ieLhS8wHLRqS/32Qo71wrhimahdvHbgU7lyA46ckJ5A+j14A340uAER0JP+5dwUTG6Sh48bog wEDT4KxtwSWOgHe+P6FSvgE63hQhKc6A72ObTOIYaCs4FozXy+FtV5zEOmi8dCPoswo8OXlyc U7wz+99u1mcDejHCJp/1wX7zoDmx2WExCnw6NyToP9KaG+9HfQfC67jrwipuBIHr6cvWDwG3m R8lkvCdRmcu16JnUTq/CGPk5iHnlwHnh/4pXC4m/eakOIzoLCmVyZxLJQUvccH+P5NHzY0Xoj kLhRnsJqSjLZk1mRW67RatU43Wz1HrZun1bB71AYNl6bezvE2K+tXNewuQSPsTt5uTtTwnM2N /CuWmEq4qlDFkaQGNJrEmAjqTr4zQTHSYEncbWQF41ZrmpkTGtAYkmSAKmeKExThVi6Js+8wm f17OiADGcaMorSiTAkpbLJgSpKke2gR6XJkOXCyK3B+CpzOg0cduILgLTyniqIKxDJaLDOm8Y OmA/vfhmJUSgqFhIQowlI4a7LJ9r/eg6JIxCipb6JLmIm3Dfbu8Y+F+cd6Ir6IEmzsP0mVjpS ncp6i9ZGfM/bkxj/o3fvQM+7ir6bxi8vqLCMW/o7fsHz/2mmFc/fdaVgX8fKhm4k+UNvb9Mtd cSL264nDz5vPbEyvjs2KfjAz81lVVX9r/KtNU+qzjNcsmdsm/Onrrt3ZEsN5Wopm6StdzYfcS lfklj732UmTa2cuWTqrvCPOcXWqN4YhBCOrm45bBfYvGalsdvoDAAA=
X-Env-Sender: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-22.tower-238.messagelabs.com!1537549371!358479!1
X-Originating-IP: [52.27.180.120]
X-SYMC-ESS-Client-Auth: mailfrom-relay-check=pass
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.14.24; banners=ecitele.com,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 6993 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2018 17:02:54 -0000
Received: from us-west-2c.mta.dlp.protect.symantec.com (HELO EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (52.27.180.120) by server-22.tower-238.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 21 Sep 2018 17:02:54 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ECI365.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ecitele-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=uzv2Ja3xg85+bPIRcdYOE4wSga+6gEWMEYMI+0jZ7/s=; b=M7YVcUXs9H4vtuxZunAk+RpqfT5TOIHw7VnW2ED8tU2YKh6mzzp4il0EKfwB/NbYOvM4SJXtpmNr3kLOSYY4eAv4Ow77lok1XACRqsW/IAeVkg24OgExBo653jB24cQUmEgWke/1Hz6BRnK7yAH5NJG90t02wD1Hd+A5af92YnM=
Received: from DB5PR0301MB1909.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.167.226.155) by DB5PR0301MB2006.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.167.227.136) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1143.18; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:02:48 +0000
Received: from DB5PR0301MB1909.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ec47:67c7:fbff:4125]) by DB5PR0301MB1909.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ec47:67c7:fbff:4125%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1143.017; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:02:48 +0000
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
CC: "draft-salam-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk@ietf.org" <draft-salam-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, Michael Gorokhovsky <Michael.Gorokhovsky@ecitele.com>, Ron Sdayoor <Ron.Sdayoor@ecitele.com>, Rotem Cohen <Rotem.Cohen@ecitele.com>
Thread-Topic: EVPN FECs in LSP Ping
Thread-Index: AdRF6Jo59jnHnDAASgOXd3gd5D/6UgIJg1yAAO+RIVM=
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:02:48 +0000
Message-ID: <DB5PR0301MB19098730D14E61E72654C0099D120@DB5PR0301MB1909.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DB5PR0301MB1909275472D15F5A67E9E35B9D010@DB5PR0301MB1909.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>, <CAF4+nEHHNjvKdRYhXV6tVTPi=5vAYq5=ozuSeXK6ER5vYFJMSg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEHHNjvKdRYhXV6tVTPi=5vAYq5=ozuSeXK6ER5vYFJMSg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [52.142.119.222]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5PR0301MB2006; 6:GbqZxYEMGXNXCqLsI/4DvPS+P6Q63VnCFlpthSsGwVfGo4iFbWWvxdJ6GCHFaQFN1Q2sAvnq1uk9/gXIJDbLlFlZzNCpF3+FQ+Cxg8R2fa7CQgjqxHkhPv4vXUqKIBJGwg5KZYU1VoXvr2iYplIGSm3VEv5UEp70MhXLGXgxHok/Tz2oBUQTaFhjX08tFfFWqX9y9st/b3WxyykCkeuKbCvTxp1m8E1A7XrTAW+Oiyh0kl9m/5PnCbAOL7XosMIx7hmGFBLmRySocbpJw9X16e3Syx9X+KIRXdsRAPRIxlXJvaK3XkxMLhX2y8fMoHYdXRtjSR9JNHUYSsrq7KuknwTHdNRX1Rk4bvS9Why+6OSbANJuHajkwOHFPOAoTuHiNxkUaXPfsHf0fhh2Bo0xxElwSGNbAoQeYPs+TAxfuhUPQn4k8UVAF7OfTscJGcmyCnQiOZwIvepd+k6GrF7QRQ==; 5:53pLPhVi3nUMRHSd3nfZUhUqB+trNdoJ5sA419hIjGYamh3/ONlI9m49xxpsJsSeHaAKpOTdIAs9hVaOC9dTtL81Rib36jJVhKtr0G+yw0zWJiOkWEHACmL5oPN5r2jucZhXd6k1jIOCbjrxkXk5/0ISKvrBFQtdNIVCRvpx6Rc=; 7:Fb8VopgMTTzDezz1fkg1Jsn9PO/7ZUj/3G7+GduaT0ZIf0hFWBx0JxtUvK76riGv5aT+5MGsga1a2tTlYY7XuWs0gZscYoXHsJ1GdPLmmD55Yl63GIJh8mdFcLEBNLTInxiIOZlgB5RN2wgvGp6Svg3Ax6G0Z+zhlt2OljkjMa+3PkxK8L07atw+35sopR5Q3MDzoGLO2I09HoiKSetHnpdqUWwdSXFlmL4Xti+bAE1ac/DhSE+JGM5oOUHywCXM
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;SOR;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 075faa80-a23f-422c-fe02-08d61fe40f10
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600074)(711020)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DB5PR0301MB2006;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB5PR0301MB2006:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB5PR0301MB2006BC52E60AA4E7B221494E9D120@DB5PR0301MB2006.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(85827821059158)(279101305709854);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3231355)(944501410)(52105095)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(201708071742011)(7699051); SRVR:DB5PR0301MB2006; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5PR0301MB2006;
x-forefront-prvs: 0802ADD973
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(346002)(252514010)(51444003)(30594003)(199004)(189003)(3846002)(14444005)(86362001)(446003)(81166006)(106356001)(4326008)(9686003)(8676002)(54906003)(6246003)(26005)(186003)(55016002)(1411001)(478600001)(107886003)(102836004)(256004)(105586002)(54896002)(11346002)(6916009)(486006)(81156014)(71190400001)(7696005)(53936002)(2906002)(6436002)(39060400002)(8936002)(25786009)(71200400001)(476003)(7736002)(33656002)(66066001)(229853002)(72206003)(5660300001)(316002)(2900100001)(68736007)(97736004)(6116002)(5024004)(6506007)(76176011)(99286004)(53546011)(5250100002)(74316002)(14454004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5PR0301MB2006; H:DB5PR0301MB1909.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ecitele.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: VEfxK/7NtYuLEeZwG6mUveFh0iY0s9QHsxXyexlN6FPi+OQs6a8Cib3zNTmGvfu4qi6faGG91Okqtn9uJdeFDwpgDZkmDT9lg1Z2VgCMn3ROC3raPRWd/YqQFTsnt2eN5JZiWe36otPXN2ticFSvB/+LuhGLwBgYbcpCqSymxF0rFOiUwThpJnGrJCo8/j7n1hnDp4m52uIMlIRItTmPVh0Rl/SWftgb5HfW4YmY4K2YOYcPI2d7rVGz3DdPhIE4vZmGjL1pf4BUB7yJD+3GJQbn2xDb5IXuE44m2DlpdpxJ+pyhR4Rle51Gv2+STMOsXRMgZcIT1OyfC8kE0o9pezAT8VvEDTVXiiFW/Vsrvpc=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DB5PR0301MB19098730D14E61E72654C0099D120DB5PR0301MB1909_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 075faa80-a23f-422c-fe02-08d61fe40f10
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Sep 2018 17:02:48.4655 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2c514a61-08de-4519-b4c0-921fef62c42a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5PR0301MB2006
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/Wr79_-sgKT18SldXmFw8Jt1Lz9k>
Subject: Re: [bess] EVPN FECs in LSP Ping
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:03:00 -0000

Donald,
Lots of thanks for your response.

I would like to clarify my question regarding learning of the MAC address ofcthe cudtomer MEP.

I fully agree that this address will be locally learned by the PE to whic the relevant customer site is attached.

But will this address advertised to remote PEs?

My reading of 7432 is that in most cases PEs advertise MAC addresses that have been locally learned from some CP protocol; 7432 specifically mentiones ARP/NDP and DHCP/DHCPv6.

I think that in order to learn and adverise MAC addresses of customer MEPs, the PE should trap or snoop Ethernet Service OAM frames (trap is required for LTM frames if MIP us intanciated in the PE).

Does this make sense to you?

Regards

Thumb typed by Sasha Vainshtein



From: Donald Eastlake
Sent: Monday, September 17, 01:43
Subject: Re: EVPN FECs in LSP Ping
To: Alexander Vainshtein
Cc: draft-salam-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, Michael Gorokhovsky, Ron Sdayoor, Rotem Cohen


Hi Sasha, Thanks for your questions. See below. On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:58 AM Alexander Vainshtein wrote: > > Dear authors of the EVPN OAM requirements and Framework draft, > > I have looked up the draft, and it looks to me as a good starting > point for work on EVPN OAM. Thanks. > I would like to clarify two points with regard to the draft: > > 1. In order to pass unicast EAOM frames (LBM/LBR and LTR), the > local MAC-VRF must learn the MAC address of the customer MEP and > advertise it to remote PEs as a MAC/IP Advertisement route. Should > this be considered as a special case of learning from the control > plane (in addition to ARP/NDP/DHCP/DHCPv6 that are mentioned in RFC > 7432)? Yes, the MAC address of the customer MEP needs to be learned but Section 9.1 of RFC 7432 includes the following text, which seems adequate to me: The PEs in a particular EVPN instance MUST support local data-plane learning using standard IEEE Ethernet learning procedures. > 2. The draft seems to propose extension of LSP Ping to test/verify > connectivity to the FECs advertised as NRLI of EVPN routes. I have > checked the IANA Registry, and no values for these FECs have been > allocated yet. Do you plan any specific work on this? LSP Ping is one mechanism indirectly referenced in Section 2.4 of the draft via the reference to RFC 6425 but there are others. Since OAM messages need to follow the same path as data, as far as practical, it seem to me there should not be any FECs allocated for OAM beyond those already needed for data. Probably wording in the draft related to FECs should be checked/adjusted. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com > Regards, > Sasha > > Office: +972-39266302 > Cell: +972-549266302 > Email: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com


___________________________________________________________________________

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is 
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this 
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original 
and all copies thereof.
___________________________________________________________________________