Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining
<thomas.morin@orange.com> Wed, 05 September 2018 13:02 UTC
Return-Path: <thomas.morin@orange.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA61128D68 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.291
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.291 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rncND83OEi4m for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orange.com (mta241.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BBD7128D0C for <bess@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar06.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.8]) by opfedar27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4253kv5dD1z2y76 for <bess@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:02:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.61]) by opfedar06.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4253kv4hNTz3wbh for <bess@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:02:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.193.71.220] (10.168.234.2) by OPEXCLILM7E.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.31.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:02:15 +0200
To: bess@ietf.org
References: <31913_1535963424_5B8CF120_31913_41_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B27D8C8@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: thomas.morin@orange.com
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <7320_1536152535_5B8FD3D7_7320_155_3_91a61fcf-5238-7dcf-9845-c4e96c9a3a22@orange.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 15:02:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <31913_1535963424_5B8CF120_31913_41_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B27D8C8@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: fr-xx-mix-fr-en
X-Originating-IP: [10.168.234.2]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/lkn9Wo4k6uWJDGs5y4pgHWCAoUs>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 13:02:19 -0000
Hi Stéphane, all, On 03/09/2018 10:30, stephane.litkowski@orange.com wrote: > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies > to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance > with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document > please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware > of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without > answers from all the Authors and Contributors. > I'm not aware of any such undisclosed IPR. > We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2]. > The OpenStack networking-bagpipe [1] project has an implementation of the API from the OpenStack networking-sfc [2] project based on the specifications in this draft. Best, -Thomas [1] https://docs.openstack.org/networking-bagpipe/latest/user/applications.html#service-chaining-sfc [2] https://docs.openstack.org/networking-sfc/latest _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
- [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draf… stephane.litkowski
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … thomas.morin
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … stephane.litkowski