IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] RFC or Draft that lists all standards track rfc’s of all mvpn profiles

"Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net> Tue, 01 October 2019 03:02 UTC

Return-Path: <zzhang@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6F912006D for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u-ZWTYqPxvcL for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06F33120025 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108160.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x9130xxi032680; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:01:57 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=9453E5XUpjbR5Q6cR41nEyqCiyqPfMx+bcxRvLcCZQI=; b=NaACAgNFWxpUL9Qvbjb0SMrQbBVOS4M2vTx8mAwrMyj6/C7azVojJs8F+iNj2AG0qSiZ HIe2KdtegGM4xBsGf+fe5PXBcZ5NBFHO2JB2xdY/iwktcKbrKv/RIYmOACBoc83NDi0a bYmTNkCuJqa6f3p/4cjT5aywrifHElvjMJBpvoQuOh9rxVgNICoOupdFQxBPN7e6OXT+ bcAGLFrkTIC9zlO4kBJkP3a8RRvqgfvMKEwUHxW8KugGgLSp06iST16iRPFv4gbQBcIx Coc7DxB8d908BJRoyZMKem9UAFX2Lu/N7gKxN+MPM1yvHqz6v2Ku/nIH11fGEuGYJwV5 CA==
Received: from nam02-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02lp2059.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.38.59]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vbecsstx9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:01:57 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=mFGJQShe7h4P9PraGvmPZVwYMyECyRZLPUPW+n/kOabhafws23krtMCW8sWs9g3cSQfG1UtWDhYSWy85wx4IAIhnZYllxAkyXKSkJH8Nx/uCkrNTcp+nWDl+W93/ckfRpFcojhZmaumhEj7iiyQ9UPHZyGV03uNaP9NmA6y264dnPvmX+FJylzFmg5ugurhHgUqJuYfjSWP6+crV1H2euHiCxFP31QVwa7QwZcgj3M3d3uCQwnkAEzb9mZ0uOKSUzbpSCKb9dxwGknBVupVaM9A+D804n2w5X2TnR8AKxdbaaefxWuGwXPKN3XW+UYu7zd0Piid4vroev+uS/+AhpQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9453E5XUpjbR5Q6cR41nEyqCiyqPfMx+bcxRvLcCZQI=; b=mGALNK42SCTjTsp7qQ0O56NPGDH9cKTOH28j2akHM5QPvj0UoKcWv0xRqRitQyBSKp/Xv8bx9tXNO9U+nmzkL7tccGlIHzrFp/aKkZeFcX8fde5ke0JrZpKvxwPacVDbVsQhHsqWtoreNweLiLuFHqK+z8C99SNWvQiBjUGNwnBD/J04yJNIjYSOETgzPiUJKKODkkCnbPB/lUK7c3oGQfmb2KEeBCmLizZqLhY4pmJb30nIveGmQlyaLLKWrsXw5zlSoVATNUHBBKJx47A7/GD7lQr3uAcXV58PkFgrZLUZkVG2ilFxo61emPNYunNSfC27HP8Ex5D4hJyBDjgJZw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
Received: from DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.242.153) by DM5PR05MB2889.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.168.173.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2327.9; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 03:01:55 +0000
Received: from DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4949:bb34:ba48:1913]) by DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4949:bb34:ba48:1913%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2327.004; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 03:01:55 +0000
From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] RFC or Draft that lists all standards track rfc’s of all mvpn profiles
Thread-Index: AQHVdidmK/vLfbtZIUGsPrTG1rS8dqdFGSaw
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 03:01:55 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR05MB3548A808389BD96AB25ECA88D49D0@DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CFE3C8DA-DF7F-479B-AC86-BC1F2EAABC52@gmail.com> <DF9654B3-201B-421C-ADE6-C65473CC8251@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DF9654B3-201B-421C-ADE6-C65473CC8251@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.2.0.14
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0d141a1a-cc0f-43bb-d4da-08d7461bb76c
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB2889:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 5
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB288916DDC32982DCE9FEA10AD49D0@DM5PR05MB2889.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0177904E6B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(366004)(136003)(396003)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(37854004)(189003)(199004)(71190400001)(52536014)(71200400001)(76116006)(606006)(2501003)(33656002)(790700001)(6116002)(229853002)(3846002)(478600001)(66476007)(86362001)(14454004)(966005)(25786009)(66066001)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(2906002)(66946007)(8936002)(81166006)(81156014)(6246003)(26005)(55016002)(54896002)(66574012)(186003)(6306002)(9686003)(236005)(6506007)(102836004)(7736002)(76176011)(53546011)(74316002)(476003)(446003)(6436002)(11346002)(486006)(99286004)(7696005)(110136005)(5660300002)(316002)(256004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB2889; H:DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: lz8Dciw9hdgqpLtS25/zvqCQKSCO3Jgor3ALSjS7QXfJeecQWWd6S4WKaZzbreGQGjBP5W+xea2nN+Age2gsAGv8oaRy7mlwN6QTqbG99H/dUImcjkmwI9dm/222BxY3y/DdweiIxVU82QsLSZ170oXe+u/q9BmJ3/7HO+3/RhW7fzVDFGiM6NXila6UdWZC0qEhJ14DfmqxKClIEih9n61cTk2wXpqNK8Tdh0f7ZkyN+fN7ojUcgdDA85gAOrcuMZHGuy++uexj1oVyUwZ62ES0P4ndUpLMxrzvyXRn3LyT4rEBxi7TpfMRAgCUaNzs44kqJMCoJhoVPQqOIH1x0QI5MEXXvtD/hpGHiDQfX82JOO2RTNcnLY135AmYWnOBm92DlPNq5QGVK8q75RALJTD2BfwR+vKEyX2zAn8NOSLLYC2eGohkn3tVp39AfwNtgyT6qsFydiHjUvaOSUlScg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM5PR05MB3548A808389BD96AB25ECA88D49D0DM5PR05MB3548namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0d141a1a-cc0f-43bb-d4da-08d7461bb76c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Oct 2019 03:01:55.0789 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Win7hojksdU6oVxL2+u5dofCBF+gz23TblPzZxL9CYHNpTbYVVjocLOO/f19owk4SBBHBNAzI9RhsdfQOxcNiQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB2889
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,1.0.8 definitions=2019-10-01_01:2019-09-30,2019-10-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1910010030
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/mAFYD-kvbMMiavbZmgYBqdl7UgE>
Subject: Re: [bess] RFC or Draft that lists all standards track rfc’s of all mvpn profiles
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 03:02:01 -0000

Another way to look at different flavors/profiles of MVPN is to consider the following two aspects:


  1.  How are C-multicast state (customer (s,g)/(*,g) or mLDP FEC signaled on PC-CE interfaces) are signaled over provider core
  2.  How are C-multicast traffic transported through the provider core

For #1, you have the choice of PIM (Rosen/PIM-MVPN and its later variants), BGP (BGP-MVPN), and mLDP (mLDP inband signaling).
For #2, your provider tunnel choice can be PIM ASM/SSM, RSVP-TE/mLDP P2MP, Ingress Replication, BIER, … and more could be defined (e.g. SR P2MP).

The two aspects together will give you many combinations and they’re referred to as different “profiles” of MVPN by a certain vendor (😊) but I personally find it easier to look at those two aspects (e.g. “BGP-MVPN with mLDP tunnel”) 😊

BTW the same applies to EVPN BUM as well.

Jeffrey

From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2019 2:06 PM
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>; bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] RFC or Draft that lists all standards track rfc’s of all mvpn profiles


I did some research and theseare the main RFCs for MVPN and how based they map to CISCO profiles and you do the same for Juniper and Huawei.

The 1st two are for mLDP w/ BGP-AD pim (in band) or bgp (out of band)c-signaling

UI-PMSI (uni directional inclusive provider multicast service instance) Cisco Default MDT for PIM SM or SSM

MI-PMSI (multi directional provider multicast service instance)  CISCO Default MDT for PIM SM or SSM

S-PMSI (Selective Provider multicast service instance) CISCO Data MDT for PIM SM or SSM

PIM dense mode MVPN  not supported - I don’t think anyone uses dense these days

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6513<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6513__;!8WoA6RjC81c!XrBWTOGj5DVLcAKHFynu0Xz-drszhVTpNKy34DkjXA0ilBykj5ljx0DKdQEKZP27$> MVPN

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6514<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6514__;!8WoA6RjC81c!XrBWTOGj5DVLcAKHFynu0Xz-drszhVTpNKy34DkjXA0ilBykj5ljx0DKdbmRB91B$> MVPN


https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6037<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6037__;!8WoA6RjC81c!XrBWTOGj5DVLcAKHFynu0Xz-drszhVTpNKy34DkjXA0ilBykj5ljx0DKdUliuPcJ$>. Rosen PIM GRE

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4875<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4875__;!8WoA6RjC81c!XrBWTOGj5DVLcAKHFynu0Xz-drszhVTpNKy34DkjXA0ilBykj5ljx0DKdQeNDgRo$> P2MP TE
Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 28, 2019, at 11:58 AM, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com<mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com>> wrote:
BESS WG / All

I am trying to find a list of all MVPN profiles that are supported by Cisco and Juniper and Huawei SP router vendors.

Below link shows what CISCO supports most of which I believe are a CISCO proprietary and non standard so won’t work between vendors.


https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/multicast/200512-Configure-mVPN-Profiles-within-Cisco-IOS.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/multicast/200512-Configure-mVPN-Profiles-within-Cisco-IOS.html__;!8WoA6RjC81c!XrBWTOGj5DVLcAKHFynu0Xz-drszhVTpNKy34DkjXA0ilBykj5ljx0DKdZzUn3UQ$>

Thank you

Gyan Mishra
Verizon Communications
Cell 301 502-1347
Sent from my iPhone

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email