IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] [Idr] Review request for draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-11

wang.yubao2@zte.com.cn Thu, 03 March 2022 02:50 UTC

Return-Path: <wang.yubao2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666823A10DC; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:50:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GG4ZHclu-iT5; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:50:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F7C3A10DD; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:50:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4K8Fp815t5z85t04; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 10:50:08 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp05.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.204]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 2232nsxd073650; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 10:49:55 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from wang.yubao2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp05[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 10:49:54 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 10:49:54 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afd62202cd233bd3196
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202203031049546902275@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: wang.yubao2@zte.com.cn
To: draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services@ietf.org
Cc: bess@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 2232nsxd073650
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.138.novalocal with ID 62202CE0.000 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1646275808/4K8Fp815t5z85t04/62202CE0.000/10.30.14.239/[10.30.14.239]/mse-fl2.zte.com.cn/<wang.yubao2@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 62202CE0.000/4K8Fp815t5z85t04
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/oHb59ScqYPcjp-Hs6DezgNmB2q8>
Subject: Re: [bess] [Idr] Review request for draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-11
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 02:50:16 -0000

Hi authors,

 

   I reviewed this draft and  I don't understand this  sentence very well:  "The  SRv6 Endpoint behavior of the Service SID thus signaled is entirely up to the originator of the advertisement"

   Is it saying that when PE1 receives an Ethernet A-D per ES route whose SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV's  SRv6 Endpoint Behavior field  is set to X （where X is not 0xFFFF),

   that Ethernet A-D per ES route should be indifferently processed by PE1 no matter what value will  X be set to?




   Is it necessary for the receiver-side processing of Ethernet A-D per ES route's Endpoint Behavior field to be clearly described?




Thanks,


Yubao

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status