Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

<slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 23 October 2019 07:52 UTC

Return-Path: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A246120059; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YRM8QWka9zz5; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2627120058; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id g7so1983903wmk.4; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=NEp5OWpYSnxnJHZUKUPjJ9X5HNDYeMcTjh/Axf5r2iE=; b=DrQPmYOasilefuuELPCHBszyXCtCNe9TC8GuJLemK75ODRiBwZ0N8xKEVlpvcoosuv d+nxzoWJCktnG2b2Q4FmKXETuA3BkDFVUYR4y/i6JCUIFaAMfR7yyNWWPBD05dfgs/+t G0AbH5G9JA0u+05EDi6k4xGSY6wroRcwUDtL0LzkHO1ITA2CLqNiVZ38y7+WfQajRpZG Gw4mD0zejGU5gGNBhq5BgBRHixuX5AZVKNZDlHp4RpJDRC1TrFlJNcO0ZtTDEAmQ4xhv rOGzDgRqDxUyuuGyFRVplyPfayg2pEzk7l5EizNxahSaT15aUw0+aQQ80K3wK59+4n5a +B/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=NEp5OWpYSnxnJHZUKUPjJ9X5HNDYeMcTjh/Axf5r2iE=; b=SIabUhNpH1FtghEMywNUdvWENTwSUH9/SeJaapZbxY/Y+B3ayD6v7KhjCJE7U4wGno GMcU2Uj1mKNbhxyaC2DfnaQ/ocZ6uLPZQ5LPIFrDZab/WWpQyxkEuUxC2oWDOQYi6Scl pgy9rhvTCKZAJGmdgv/8saDhbk5xdouOQc++uSDYx1KJyVOFVk0zsiiCQ3Fb3/7vpIVt 9nAKXGO9549iJUyaacoPTsChUQ7PbzR7uAgnXw/rf3gve6NFwEL2j53mdQVIfCEtxnfT HLawqR2qtX+Ktp75yLhHexOIMy8WqH53CihUfwVz3XLCMC1/J9Mt+wpyPHpNb6hRpE40 4cGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWGmuh1bkkQo1J8So5NorFsXfqa+fVV7Fjvj7o0yZNxCfpJtcsz TBCpftPFiRT5E9YJp3KujPi2Esg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxRZjcKijMSjGnswy7yXui7EIvzFnkuAAAbUzY5ZyReKhl3rfPzgMCfHNJ8ZTNriyT6JA3ZqA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2943:: with SMTP id n3mr6313703wmd.11.1571817134188; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SLITKOWS3YYU6 ([2001:420:c0c0:1005::249]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n205sm9035543wmf.22.2019.10.23.00.52.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com
To: 'Luc André Burdet' <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>, bess@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df@ietf.org
Cc: bess-chairs@ietf.org
References: <079001d588e7$78847ff0$698d7fd0$@gmail.com> <DM6PR07MB425254F5A35E42442F5DEC44AF6B0@DM6PR07MB4252.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR07MB425254F5A35E42442F5DEC44AF6B0@DM6PR07MB4252.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:52:11 +0200
Message-ID: <097f01d58976$c7db9360$5792ba20$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0980_01D58987.8B6526B0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGemJXFkp6xgo4XHCqC4N4nqnXwxwGvWfIjp8hBUZA=
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/pMoBnLEVGrxomNg9rtCRnnkzaHY>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 07:52:18 -0000

Hi Luc André,

 

Thanks for your feedback.

It is always better to share comments on the list so other people can react
too.

 

Stephane

 

 

From: Luc André Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com> 
Sent: mercredi 23 octobre 2019 03:38
To: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df@ietf.org
Cc: bess-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

 

Support, while noting that updating [DF] for [RFC8584] throughout will
remove a missref.

 

I will send a few other minor comments offline to authors;

 

Regards,

Luc André

 

Luc André Burdet |  Cisco  |  laburdet.ietf@gmail.com
<mailto:laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>   |  Tel: +1 613 254 4814

 

 

From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org> > on behalf
of "slitkows.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> "
<slitkows.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> >
Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 10:47
To: "bess@ietf.org <mailto:bess@ietf.org> " <bess@ietf.org
<mailto:bess@ietf.org> >, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df@ietf.org
<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df@ietf.org> "
<draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df@ietf.org
<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df@ietf.org> >
Cc: "bess-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:bess-chairs@ietf.org> "
<bess-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:bess-chairs@ietf.org> >
Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

 

Hello WG,

 

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-04 [1].

 

This poll runs until * the 5th Of November *.

 

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF
IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from
all the Authors and Contributors. 

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

 

If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in
conformance with IETF rules.

 

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2]. 

 

Thank you,

Stephane & Matthew

 

[1]  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df/>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df/

[2]
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw>
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw