Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

<slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 04 February 2020 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C627120020; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 05:54:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I2HvE0VvMHkc; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 05:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2629B1200C4; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 05:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id z9so10929726wrs.10; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 05:54:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=/FepRJd1ESaEgJeNK95FeR5QJ9EAKYjwcajkY8bdIOs=; b=rxzZK0dahyC+zfXTdhQu6KUvIMG0i+pwAaEv9EJcx/kVnoQ0rSdO8FC95xesrAmho8 D8VkKMsboNkbbZq/LzOrnKmgVbUWM0qhhVGzndleDLnjnlBeg1P6Nfq2Tqb5YSzUpFRj +5Tm/yJUDdRDJzCRcwKlfzDCMyvWx4beKUzN518YdXeGYXO22PsN0NMtSXx7hTt3/mdU hDbkXt5tuqsZ/H0uPtbIRHeTEvsUiLEEjJfcBH+7vbGhtB3R38ta/ymHxNhGPOqVB620 UlPEebGPuUZMoAsyuWd+xi0ubW0KU4db39cnTj+i30JQ4UpQF5CLJeDsHhE0DiRa9APb 8TSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=/FepRJd1ESaEgJeNK95FeR5QJ9EAKYjwcajkY8bdIOs=; b=kF7udoxhiU4FSj/DsOmu+kHT1oiokjNu1768hIAh1VVNVof0AaC3bDGjKVKh8nUsLR gPbmEXvuFgABm8nkSPuy6NmoFRDqdLhRNx/80noZrrqlm6VI2KOVhDy7y9HswqFVSnQc rWxzAqpWjHXg/TMFYgIV0QNv5YVNpM9uwNmcu2Dfincof0pz5S6nQ0DlizNVrjhdOBOe D3XN02aV/TV5OD/tpcBwWbKD5r1PfZyvTikTEi3y6Jpmb4AkjNwuvVz3Qa6wVR4Vsoep +qaFMjkWOOkytqWa6zzb//SmLGYHwrm3q/KzqpNpLHtAAMekgxaWiD1dAB97EVQ8ep4X 0+wg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV3C8eBCBPT19zpXxZdJJgp0bUUk0GTTYznAptTlW87G4r1POvr WrY4nTPcDNVEypkzdvRmuk1FpZE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzn4e9c3wFuvGy58o6D4MY5hPzflW+hTrsELkrkqQeH4tMXjm+oCEUo3usdnlnFr9jnKeWaLg==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4a8c:: with SMTP id o12mr21590391wrq.43.1580824449327; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 05:54:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SLITKOWS3YYU6 ([173.38.220.38]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y12sm3842126wmj.6.2020.02.04.05.54.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Feb 2020 05:54:08 -0800 (PST)
From: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com
To: bess@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.authors@ietf.org
Cc: bess-chairs@ietf.org
References: <013601d5cd13$fceb7620$f6c26260$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <013601d5cd13$fceb7620$f6c26260$@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 14:54:07 +0100
Message-ID: <00cd01d5db62$924e7170$b6eb5450$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CE_01D5DB6A.F414D540"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQKewHkh0g6xy3jFqCNzo8r1HqvDLqZ5Q55w
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/p_1GSZ0qZA714a6ON38bHWzCdos>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:54:13 -0000

This poll is now closed without any objection to progress.

However (expect if I have missed it), I haven't heard about any
implementation.

 

Is there any known implementation ? If NO, is the WG against progressing the
document without an implementation ?

 

Feedback required by the end of the week.

 

Thanks,

 

 

 

From: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> 
Sent: vendredi 17 janvier 2020 09:56
To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.authors@ietf.org
Cc: bess-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 

 

Hi WG,

 

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

 

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

 

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.

 

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF
IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from
all the Authors and Contributors. 

There is currently no IPR disclosed.  

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please
indicate if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

 

[1]
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw>
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw

[2]  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/