IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] Suggestion on v4-only/v6-only drafts

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 11 November 2022 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106FBC15C51F for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 04:30:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yvs0jVqe6dpn for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 04:30:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C916EC15256C for <bess@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 04:29:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 21so7438100edv.3 for <bess@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 04:29:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ha4q7A/Z6PqbADeS8sP/TtQQ+sIgfmHSyKGnskGrhC4=; b=TpofSYywz4WeHH4M4z35XOAj7jqYFdeEZGs9ejiS8V4uNq3m4cxxffUb1VMxJwWJwy QBkGSPw4H7m24iNzl86BmZafU5DSIyUvZluKeIT0xqxDWDNn0xDttdglTPmN8fnXutF6 Q5aKQHiOzEcUiesYlmsSs5mySLrL+0jIR8Z6qfLxmM1vLBlNQzoJDo1tTy97TaEhCOMh GKbrMEnADQutiFMewXQPNAhhZ2lS6HW5UzGwCjpYYdrExptFelbj3v5UOVUpZthG2eE0 9HbqDLGus3GAl9djZHHGAsBwBvG5Wd5yXWn6D7ZEiSgC0+EsleZYkpB4MlURBlEUZFDE QuHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ha4q7A/Z6PqbADeS8sP/TtQQ+sIgfmHSyKGnskGrhC4=; b=CZRoK3Fs3t6cddykO5O4YkWfs2WSAjHWU5GNtQc+yYRfxA5B96j53S4ItImHY0+uMs BsWh115SpDxCqS/f1KyfZujXdTQNeX8lF5dBkiTJjtoWK8ekrMgZ0iajphfAx19FpPCS KUdfroIRTwtBUbfBa4beDxA/A5CitjgyRzyUs2CVg8mWwqu25gCIxqmPNVtXgg1XQ3vI 3H60hVC3OHX8ZOxNpIyPNk+nznPg+R1SDQSPPSKqK0LcD/1OkWaS9D6zOjD3O2xwe9wE BEZt2//NiboMagwmVN7cH26ZFIEaKr8/WiQzIwTcUpIllZ7QsVl0/LmmdpXU3KukoWrk 2Raw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pneIx/rvjEqeMoLd7exLotq1L1+WKqDF6zCWHGKuubUS4mwUlii CAj/5Bn5kCxFOUIgvLIWHDRhNU7vcHIKF88gDqqzRunnayLYEA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4crmhcAjMAHagD1ub6f4u8jJFSCgkIE7W3bzswOfHK4uJzMLyQgnTdnTVux42i/MkVLa3tcbMy1N1+ijhHDkg=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:db02:0:b0:458:d7b7:d912 with SMTP id t2-20020aa7db02000000b00458d7b7d912mr1201035eds.316.1668169777665; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 04:29:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH6gdPzcMxor9hZy=+hS5oZPB_onU45-vh-ijm1jD2WPb0y+Gw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH6gdPzcMxor9hZy=+hS5oZPB_onU45-vh-ijm1jD2WPb0y+Gw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:29:26 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGhpxG3eMmdk+Sqk_erapJUM8tjv-Sqm2J66KOEh1Ctrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000005ed9405ed310bdc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/qTiOacRy5E1rB6pmOq6yDXciLWE>
Subject: Re: [bess] Suggestion on v4-only/v6-only drafts
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:30:14 -0000

Hi Ketan,

If you are referring to interconnecting v4 only sites draft I have number
of comments:

* The draft is not needed at all

* we can seamlessly interconnect v4 sites over v6 core using v4 mapped v6
addresses

* Zero control plane change is required/needed

* number of vendors are shipping it

Moreover sites even if today speaking v4 only sooner then later will talk
also v6. We can not ship a std track document which makes v6 deployment
harder or no-op for any site.

Best,
Robert

On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, 11:19 Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gyan,
>
> Sharing a couple of suggestions here for your 5 drafts (4 in BESS + 1 in
> IDR) as we lost time due to the audio issues:
>
> (1) put the portions to be standardized (very focussed/small hopefully) in
> one single draft and post/share with both IDR and BESS since you are
> changing NH encoding (from what I heard?)
> (2) all other informational/BCP material could be combined in a single
> draft (perhaps the existing BESS WG draft)
>
> IMHO, that would facilitate an appropriate focussed review of the
> content/proposals.
>
> Thanks,
> Ketan
>
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email