Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03

Jeff Tantsura <> Tue, 14 February 2017 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506D112950C for <>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:23:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PnuJNzwRrmkO for <>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:23:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5D57129416 for <>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id o16so27050713wra.2 for <>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:23:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vkbtz5NnIucRAUkkCy5Ai/kChAnushlSTGY9sPDYbh4=; b=HKySmv66SyeVeWnlngw5g+YnuTk1jyZhfjk92mlxHtJm1101PMzKewyqIrTVqwD0Zh VjiFtxIULrvfi9PajBlwrLZAMA9CseyNsE0yrT/MbrKEkKtfrqIIGBAtfAspJhl+vyae nzwdhDsflAFtt2RG0vHkOOxthSlJN5sE/3HLEGtd0qQacnyxd6kITLRmHWloRkFf+XnB BfQFaf3DkT8k1DjQ2PrHAgIPcZk8YkTFyUAQa886Lby3jjI0UhCj8ZP6Fdi+EQaNb2Gp IBhCAv1SV0ANyT3B6qKl0OGg9AIfLqEU3HwbvzRZogP3DfnscSrJ1ReuyTuN1mlE/KHE sjfg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vkbtz5NnIucRAUkkCy5Ai/kChAnushlSTGY9sPDYbh4=; b=QgmFl1841XXKXQE/0psOq2R1iLFrySVSEhdTtmASkaXd/8O8MeKaXcULbUWQiX6vGp Czg/IwIL/25VmKd/+WB/SQy4MpBGwqJNHUYam6GyrzTFHFBVhi3LK2ra9gnKXcQPwC0+ BjncwTwhrJFeyXaz3NiswY/pusTyR6L3cnAfTQNeY4xXL2J2YpyLfAM9IcP+wwNqAZq4 AMPziqfSS/nzfA3VClGBY8bgclxnqRM9EF16JC4iKXYyzFfZCbz8J+NOkJbwI7DDMmxr GVJzRdxCtHVJakUIff+HwchSlF7W1JtM+JXW3rlcdaygFlT4XLFWmGhbWQZuVsKdpZQZ 7feA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m9uxK16G1N1olC5874hJFTHnHVKEhKjvSjZhqOYefDBvqi30O4cmvNtAWIqd24fA==
X-Received: by with SMTP id 93mr23890024wrr.13.1487067831289; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ([]) by with ESMTPSA id 18sm181569wrb.14.2017. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:23:50 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1e.0.170107
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:23:49 -0800
From: Jeff Tantsura <>
To: "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR)" <>, BESS <>
Message-ID: <>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:23:54 -0000

    On 2/13/17, 11:07 PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" < on behalf of> wrote:
        Hello Working Group,
        This email starts a Working Group Last Call on 
        draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03 [1] which is considered 
        mature and ready for a final working group review.
        Note that this call is longer than usual because we are pushing two 
        correlated documents together.
        Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent
        version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than
        *5th of March*.
        Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is 
        also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as a Proposed 
        Standard RFC.
        *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that 
        applies to draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding, to ensure that 
        IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 
        4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
        *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor of
        draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03 please respond to this 
        email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
        Note that, as of today, no IPR has been disclosed against this document 
        or its earlier versions.
        We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all of 
        what this document specifies. This information is expected as per [2]. 
        Please inform the mailing list, or the chairs, or only one of the chairs.
        Thank you,
    BESS mailing list