Re: [bess] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-08: (with COMMENT)

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 19 February 2018 19:56 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kuehlewind.net; b=Q8ieTGo+x6gqcwxaYIh3G+GpxsR6B0LHWrTHJL9Q+Acptf4zFlxDMPeXZdkh5AhsHR6iVshfSTu1dKZw5ixX20WisK3DMCDOuaNCSYhC4mC7+Z/TRvcAIG0aCVyqD9y/bFNhMHYogWk0htI5FIxu/YNJieWA84bfvkD0jASUlzY=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-PPP-Message-ID:X-PPP-Vhost;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <136089E3-27FA-4570-8151-3730BF2035B9@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 20:49:23 +0100
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage@ietf.org>, "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8340F031-0409-4B57-9316-A025AB7D9EB5@kuehlewind.net>
References: <151904794146.18699.5332623354542357293.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <136089E3-27FA-4570-8151-3730BF2035B9@nokia.com>
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/tzFXWQl7-1A26jgDoigJ-qf4-Vk>
Subject: Re: [bess] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-08: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

Ah, thanks. That’s much more clear to me!

> Am 19.02.2018 um 20:47 schrieb Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>:
> 
> Hi Mirja,
> 
> It should be "must be enable". However you are right that the sentence may be worded a bit better.
> We can change it as follows:
> 
>   It is worth noting that unknown unicast flooding must not be
>   suppressed, unless (at least) one of the following two statements are
>   given: a) control or management plane learning is performed
>   throughout the entire EVI for all the MACs or b) all the EVI-attached
>   devices signal their presence when they come up (GARPs or similar).
> 
> Thanks.
> Jorge
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
> Date: Monday, February 19, 2018 at 2:45 PM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage@ietf.org>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
> Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-08: (with COMMENT)
> Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
> Resent-To: <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>, <senad.palislamovic@nokia.com>, <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>, <sajassi@cisco.com>, <uttaro@att.com>
> Resent-Date: Monday, February 19, 2018 at 2:45 PM
> 
>    Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
>    draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-08: No Objection
> 
>    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>    introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
>    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
>    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage/
> 
> 
> 
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    COMMENT:
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>    Possible nit:
>    sec 9.1.3: "It is worth noting that unless: a) control or management plane
>       learning is performed through the entire EVI or b) all the EVI-
>       attached devices signal their presence when they come up (GARPs or
>       similar), unknown unicast flooding must be enabled."
>      Is this "must be enabled" or "must not be enabled"?
> 
> 
> 
>

[bess] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ie… Mirja Kühlewind
Re: [bess] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Re: [bess] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)