Re: [bess] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree

"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com> Mon, 01 February 2016 02:53 UTC

Return-Path: <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702901A88C9 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:53:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XRT2rW-4YOmU for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:53:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A34171A88D0 for <bess@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:53:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3314; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454295200; x=1455504800; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=WfBPpKLoo+ZtRoUxntyoo/R9TymFPPZdwT43S8ljse8=; b=caY9JKRvJg3csTouUgi5rvvs0ag4GwDIkRd/UXe/Po1hY3n4jamL68OG ojIXIqtZ9wKsW+CtrlV2wt/kagjbnvhJMPCKoXWz6IkNH8T800vlxeO5v 9GcuQMOsSjU3mpCythBt3oPNDFOAN0MRUnDoZuSe1Imm4xrQwXl+2AR3r Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAgBQyK5W/5ldJa1egzpSbQaIUrE+AQ2BYxgKhW0CgSk4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoRBAQEBBAEBARpRFwQCAQgRBAEBAScHJwsUCQgCBAESFIgHDrwbAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQSKRoQCEQEchDwFjV2JEgGFRogEgVuEQoMlhS6KbINRAR4BAUKDbGoBh0w0fAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,378,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="233362278"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2016 02:53:19 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-003.cisco.com (xch-rtp-003.cisco.com [64.101.220.143]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u112rJWh005156 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 02:53:19 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) by XCH-RTP-003.cisco.com (64.101.220.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 21:53:18 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 21:53:18 -0500
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
To: Poorna Pushkala B <poorna@juniper.net>, Wen Lin <wlin@juniper.net>, "EXT - thomas.morin@orange.com" <thomas.morin@orange.com>, 'BESS' <bess@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree
Thread-Index: AQHRUpaME/U9KT8MU0ut9l7k3idEc58MIOcAgAA4RgCAAYa1AIAIgBGA
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 02:53:18 +0000
Message-ID: <D2D402AD.1786C8%sajassi@cisco.com>
References: <569DF8F7.2000703@orange.com> <000301d15763$0b0c4f70$2124ee50$@com> <D2CB9EF1.6ED28%wlin@juniper.net> <9D19FA16-D2F7-49F1-8E8A-C124DC0735F7@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <9D19FA16-D2F7-49F1-8E8A-C124DC0735F7@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.8.151023
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.76.53]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <4EC67B6879DD2845A55B56EA93E5CA58@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/u6sOuR4gKTTpoU01bPYfA6ppmdQ>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 02:53:22 -0000

Thanks. This has already been noted and IANA section has been updated
accordingly.

Cheers,
Ali 


On 1/26/16, 11:04 AM, "BESS on behalf of Poorna Pushkala B"
<bess-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of poorna@juniper.net> wrote:

>Hi
>
>In section 5.1 of version 3 of the draft, the subtype is mentioned as
>³0x05², whereas the figure below shows it as ³0x04².
>Can the authors kindly fix it? Thanks.
>
>Regards
>Poorna
>
>
>5.1 
><https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03#section-5.1>
>E-TREE Extended Community
>
>   This Extended Community is a new transitive Extended Community having
>   a Type field value of 0x06 (EVPN) and the Sub-Type 0x05.
>
>
>        0                   1                   2                   3
>        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>       | Type=0x06     | Sub-Type=0x04 | Flags(1 Octet)|               |
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>       |  Reserved=0   |           Leaf Label                          |
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>
>
>
>
>On 1/25/16, 9:46 AM, "Wen Lin" <wlin@juniper.net> wrote:
>
>>Fully support as a co-author. I am not aware of any un-disclosed IPR.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Wen
>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 2:51 AM
>>>To: BESS; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org
>>>Subject: [bess] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree
>>>
>>>Hello Working Group,
>>>
>>>This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
>>>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree
>>>[1] which is considered mature and ready for a final working group
>>>review.
>>>
>>>Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet
>>>(-03), and send your comments to the list, no later than *February the
>>>2nd* (2016-02-02).
>>>
>>>This is not only a call for comments on the document, but also a call of
>>>support for its publication.
>>>
>>>*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
>>>applies
>>>to draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in
>>>compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for
>>>more
>>>details).
>>>
>>>*If* you are listed as a document author or contributor of
>>>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree please respond to this email and indicate
>>>whether
>>>or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
>>>
>>>Thank you,
>>>
>>>Thomas/Martin
>>>
>>>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>BESS mailing list
>>>BESS@ietf.org
>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>BESS mailing list
>>>BESS@ietf.org
>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>BESS mailing list
>>BESS@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>_______________________________________________
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess