Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment

"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com> Tue, 08 January 2019 23:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE48E12D4F0 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:17:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id McPiQeZmjNyq for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:17:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 217E713110F for <bess@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:17:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17606; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1546989432; x=1548199032; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=P3lfui/NiihdqMzxUrC8Ddf29MusBPZoGk3Ci/HfmY4=; b=J8MN2VARUORU8N7n+4/y5dbXrUtm1P0Zvvzf3134f7fN+Jxd95LU1Rrt SpPYHBbBJW7+m55NEBh8Sk1naGpXaRxewTnX1h/KSsOKl+5879xTqha9W FxRGA775DAgJOOeG0MTYIQYekNvF+vq1Alpe554pMmz1jOo+RWkxBvFMx Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAADALjVc/5ldJa1jGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ1ILmaBAicKg3aIGo1TJYkeiHCFYhS?= =?us-ascii?q?BZwsBARgBDIRHAheBeyI0CQ0BAwEBAgEBAm0cDIVKAQEBBAEBIUsbAgEIEQM?= =?us-ascii?q?BAigDAgICHwYLFAkIAQEEARKDIgGBHUwDFQ+qEoEvhC0BE0CDAw2CGAWMPxe?= =?us-ascii?q?Bf4ERJwwTgkyCV0cBAQMBgSoBEgE2CQwKglMxgiYCiTcKhhOGZIp8MwkChxa?= =?us-ascii?q?HLYMzGIFjhSSKbokcCUWBB4QBgRKKIwIRFIEnHzgoPXFwFTsqAYJBglGITIU?= =?us-ascii?q?/QTGIXIEfgR8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,455,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="222727754"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jan 2019 23:17:10 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-002.cisco.com (xch-rtp-002.cisco.com [64.101.220.142]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x08NHAD4014993 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 Jan 2019 23:17:10 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) by XCH-RTP-002.cisco.com (64.101.220.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 18:17:09 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 18:17:09 -0500
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
To: Tim <yutianpeng.ietf@gmail.com>, "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment
Thread-Index: AdSK9MoVutPXDdgmS+OMrGu2oHHStwbzcVMAADMkm4A=
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 23:17:09 +0000
Message-ID: <C9AA0D7F-9519-41A8-8FED-5E8794492395@cisco.com>
References: <17128_1543833795_5C0508C3_17128_38_7_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B778825@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <b8a609d8-0e79-07d1-eb55-0a80076456ca@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b8a609d8-0e79-07d1-eb55-0a80076456ca@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.5.181209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.76.53]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9AA0D7F951941A88FED5E8794492395ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.142, xch-rtp-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/uMt0jwD1KrUNRZNCBDDw4c9zBQ0>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 23:17:15 -0000

Tim, Mankamana,

The rev02 of the draft has the updates to address your latest comments.

Cheers,
Ali

From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Tim <yutianpeng.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, January 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM
To: "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>om>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment


Hi,

Support this work as an individual. This document is a great and elegant step for EVPN towards SP network.

Some small comments by the way:

1. Figure 2 shows the scope of EVPN network but the other figures in the document not. Please kindly update, then it is more readable.

2. There are 2 Figure 2

3. Document is lack of mention on E-Tree, it should work without any extra consideration right?

4. Please fix format issue in section 8 and update TBD in section 9.

Thanks,

Tim


On 2018/12/3 18:43, stephane.litkowski@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkowski@orange.com> wrote:

Hello Working Group,



This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment [1]



This poll runs until *the 17th of December*.



We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.



There is currently no IPR disclosed.



If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.



We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2].



    Thank you,

    Stephane & Matthew



    [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment/



    [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.



_______________________________________________

BESS mailing list

BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess