Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-11: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Mon, 17 September 2018 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDA6130E23; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 20:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id viZ_BDbywMmP; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 20:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu [18.7.68.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD72B130E16; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 20:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074424-601ff70000001013-d8-5b9f19ffe866
Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id CC.24.04115.00A1F9B5; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 23:05:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id w8H35YmY012789; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 23:05:34 -0400
Received: from kduck.kaduk.org (24-107-191-124.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com [24.107.191.124]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id w8H35Thj023498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 16 Sep 2018 23:05:32 -0400
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 22:05:28 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Hiroshi Tsunoda <tsuno@m.ieice.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib@ietf.org, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20180917030528.GC63180@kduck.kaduk.org>
References: <153671698701.17065.13377651669195105482.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAPbjwkyiKQv4wXVi15A9d6KQOmd=u9r_mG3fv2NuVMu9o7KNSg@mail.gmail.com> <20180916021557.GW48265@kduck.kaduk.org> <CAPbjwkyo4iEg8U7OFZof8owzD-XftNiDop01ZjxqFL4nZuU7cQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPbjwkyo4iEg8U7OFZof8owzD-XftNiDop01ZjxqFL4nZuU7cQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupkleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IR4hTV1mWQmh9t8OCkpsXOi3+YLVYcn8ls sW7WdEaLC2uFLU5+72FxYPVoOfKW1WPJkp9MHrvXLmcNYI7isklJzcksSy3St0vgyji2pIG9 4AFbRdcJlgbG1axdjJwcEgImEm2b29i7GLk4hAQWM0lsPd3EAuFsZJRoXXYGyrnKJDHlyU+g Fg4OFgFVid2TRUG62QRUJBq6LzOD2CIC6hLzv00Am8osUCrR9vowO4gtLBAt8WTaCyYQmxdo 25QDPVAz25kkjnw8xw6REJQ4OfMJC0SzlsSNfy+ZQHYxC0hLLP/HARLmFAiUmH0eokRUQFli b98h9gmMArOQdM9C0j0LoXsBI/MqRtmU3Crd3MTMnOLUZN3i5MS8vNQiXXO93MwSvdSU0k2M oFBmd1HZwdjd432IUYCDUYmHN6NvXrQQa2JZcWXuIUZJDiYlUd6tXrOjhfiS8lMqMxKLM+KL SnNSiw8xSnAwK4nwMvPNjxbiTUmsrEotyodJSXOwKInzntedHC0kkJ5YkpqdmlqQWgSTleHg UJLgVZAEahQsSk1PrUjLzClBSDNxcIIM5wEafkgCZHhxQWJucWY6RP4Uoy7Hn/dTJzELseTl 56VKifN+FwcqEgApyijNg5sDSkES2ftrXjGKA70lzPsSZBQPMH3BTXoFtIQJaEnGhjkgS0oS EVJSDYzZvzbUlO3VPOO0Tfahde7eTbnq16suTX01p3zPfsZbDtayL4KPXd+/1+nlkmO5cul1 FdNnVNo3vbt8t+ZTfpnNfd3NvC5fuGM+dRzg1j7YGN5V+2ZOt77pP15frV7lLKUUfy7nggf9 7HWb+Je3Ckf9eWii/L/DwOx62zw3o0XH7t5VXbT2j5oSS3FGoqEWc1FxIgCl4bW0HAMAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/vQ3SnPIIN2565BoRkXZxCa9RwwQ>
Subject: Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 03:05:42 -0000

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:58:59AM +0900, Hiroshi Tsunoda wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
> 
> > I was thinking about each table having its own subsection.
> > In particular, when I was reading, it was easy for me to miss the comments
> > like "-- Table of PMSI information", especially when the comment was on a
> > different page from the actual MIB contents.  Having a section number might
> > make those boundaries more clear.
> 
> Thank you for your clarification.
> I have carefully considered your suggestion, but it looks a bit redundant
> for me when each table has its own subsection.
> Consequently, I have decided to keep the original style.
> I would appreciate your understanding of my decision.

It is entirely your decision and I can see how my suggestion would not
necessarily be the best choice.

Thanks for letting me know,

Benjamin