Re: [bess] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track-12: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 24 October 2018 23:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92F912D4EC; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O_10FfwYZauj; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF42C129BBF; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.27] (cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w9ON1LTV092490 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:01:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106] claimed to be [10.0.1.27]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <E08B6964-C30C-4044-84D3-25D6FCEC3F2E@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0606BF2D-7276-4124-94F3-49966B72CBA0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:01:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <2a8150db-632f-f5ba-fb9d-42dabaeb11d8@nokia.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track@ietf.org>, "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
To: "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
References: <154041494845.6871.5752369796279130064.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2a8150db-632f-f5ba-fb9d-42dabaeb11d8@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/yRXaMTDeRu-cAUjgbYXG_GUyjRM>
Subject: Re: [bess] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 23:01:25 -0000

Excellent, thanks!

> On Oct 24, 2018, at 4:29 PM, Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> Ben,
> 
> thank you for your review.
> Regarding your substantive COMMENT: the disclosure came at the time of
> WG adoption. The WG was thus specifically informed of that and given an
> extra week to (re)consider the positions already expressed.
> 
> The existence of the IPR was also mentioned and referenced in the WG
> Last Call e-mail.
> 
> -m
> 
> Le 2018-10-24 à 23:02, Ben Campbell a écrit :
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track-12: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Thanks for the work on this!
>> 
>> *** Substantive Comments ***
>> 
>> I support Mirja's DISCUSS.
>> 
>> - There is an IPR disclosure with possible royalties. The shepherd report says
>> there were no WG objections. How was the disclosure communicated? For example,
>> was the WG reminded of the disclosure at WGLC?
>> 
>> *** Editorial Comments ***
>> 
>> §3:
>> - Part way through the section, starting with "We also introduce a new notion,
>> the "match for tracking":", there is a section of text that has a significantly
>> different tone from the rest of the draft. It switches more of a lecture style,
>> then switches back. I suggest an edit pass to keep a consistent tone.  (I know
>> this is a question of style, and I will not press it further if people prefer
>> not to change it.)
>> 
>> - 2 paragraphs starting with "For a given C-flow..."
>> Why is this indented?
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> BESS mailing list
>> BESS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>>