[bess] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 04 April 2019 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BFB1201D4; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 08:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags@ietf.org, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>, bess-chairs@ietf.org, mach.chen@huawei.com, bess@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.94.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <155439077860.30886.5079044693331454522.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 08:12:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/ygAZnme9yBuXVYQUO172qI68ajI>
Subject: [bess] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-?= =?utf-8?q?ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 15:12:59 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Given this document updates the normative behaviour of RFC 4761, I would have
expected to see some discussion about interoperability. Is the behaviour as
specified in RFC 4761 not widely deployed/implemented or would it be possible
to add some sentences about interoperability which already deployed devices?

One minor editorial request:
- Please expand PE on first occurrence.