Re: [bess] Poll to progress draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-controlplane without implementation

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 05 April 2019 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358E7120600 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ekL-zgTnc4Gj for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB9471205FF for <bess@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44bQq92D4Pz1ktxx; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1554483173; bh=e+6XbVvQqLwcRALq0yGHBC0ozQrGhfPi1HJSs9yksDo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Dw16uNffSZ8EwpMtJaFtNQdQ8jaYMXgAn0oCGbkWgWO02K4vgZA/qO4IIB8JqC77i UrzeowBUXifijr/L/fpQE0Ex7H6otL2RnjpiLMJ/xga8FOpt4l/My9NhHXqD7dSbSG dPucVCqG/c0sm85UbSkO3H95KpI5u0ZGaRId0Qtw=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maila2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44bQq83tQzz1ktxT; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
To: stephane.litkowski@orange.com, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
References: <6232_1554379102_5CA5F15E_6232_163_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924C1E3E58@OPEXCAUBMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <77e592a4-1726-eee2-e1d0-1c59700b9215@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 12:52:50 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6232_1554379102_5CA5F15E_6232_163_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924C1E3E58@OPEXCAUBMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/ztKBufOsWQeVoFjAW01p8bpda9Q>
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll to progress draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-controlplane without implementation
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 16:52:56 -0000

I think is a useful complement to the work in RFC 8300.  It appears 
ready for publication.  Given the evolution in SFC usage, I think 
getting this out there now serves the community better than waiting for 
the implementations.  Please do progress this.

Thank you,
Joel

On 4/4/19 1:58 PM, stephane.litkowski@orange.com wrote:
> Hi WG,
> 
> draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-controlplane has passed WGLC and its finishing 
> the shepherd’s review phasis (I-D update required).. It is in a good 
> shape to progress further. However we are not aware of any 
> implementation. As per our Implementation Requirement Policy, we need to 
> poll the WG to know if WG agrees to progress the document without 
> implementation.
> 
> This email starts a 2 weeks poll closing on 04/18/2019.
> 
> Please raise your support or any concern regarding the progress of this 
> document without implementation.
> 
> If you are aware of any implementation, please also state it.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane/
> 
> Brgds,
> 
> Stephane & Matthew
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>