Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 20 December 2018 03:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F1C130F1A; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:53:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nDjCSM93n9R8; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8DA5130F40; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.45] (cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wBK3qpQl033949 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:52:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1545277974; bh=6y7gC6nPFNiCcI5sAixmSqLqBMdfc07h8EmQgfrkCMQ=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=iFUZ+L+rXP7Sj+zKOoBI3vQ3WAvdeOV1YeuGWgdxd5d7rut4OHDBQOWN6rZ8hUoqX gfHM/ZohU3xEVtiWUX76H9yuEpedTO0ePe6GENz0u24zS1+CTVOUvmfXaBwvdVNdgs S9j/95xupDZ2JFk4t1oCgKTJBAlyoFaZS1vWPnE4=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106] claimed to be [10.0.1.45]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <2FFDC87D-5026-4C28-B256-131E3CDA7FC2@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_469976C0-2177-4622-AE69-E5B7237037E5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:52:50 -0600
In-Reply-To: <BD283DB2-0DBF-448D-AE5D-F7D517DB79D1@cisco.com>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, "mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com" <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
References: <BD283DB2-0DBF-448D-AE5D-F7D517DB79D1@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/-mSRwnQEHUpn54STZmL0n72TUZo>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 03:53:06 -0000

I’ve probably lost track of the discussion somewhere; but it looks like 4583bis and mux-attributes still disagree on the mux-categories for confid, userid, and floorid. Was there a plan to change those in mux-attributes prior to publication?

Thanks,

Ben.

> On Dec 18, 2018, at 4:10 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Ben,
> 
> Please have a look at this updated version and let us know if it addresses your DISCUSS.
> Reviews by others and confirmation that this update addresses your comments would be appreciated as well.
> 
> Thanks,
> Charles
> 
> From: bfcpbis <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com <mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>>
> Date: Friday, December 14, 2018 at 8:00 AM
> To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com <mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>>, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com <mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>" <bfcpbis@ietf.org <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27
> 
> Thanks Christer. Here are the links to the corresponding draft. All the changes in it look good to me.
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Christer Holmberg and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27.txt <https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27.txt>
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis/>
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27>
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis>
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27 <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27>
> 
> Cheers,
> Charles
> 
> From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com <mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>>
> Date: Saturday, December 8, 2018 at 7:42 AM
> To: Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com <mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>>, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com <mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>" <bfcpbis@ietf.org <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Based on the gen-art review, and the IESG reviews, I have submitted a new version (-27) of draft-rfc4583bis.
> 
> The new version implements the following merged pull request:
> 
> https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-bfcp-4583bis/pull/13 <https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-bfcp-4583bis/pull/13>
> 
> Thank You to everyone who provided comments!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer