Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt

["Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <[e-mail]>]

Paul/Suhas - 

Could you share your thoughts on this so we know what document updates are required.

Thanks,

Gonzalo


> On Feb 9, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In general I am fine with the latest versions of the draft.
> 
> However, in draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri I think the mux category needs to be specified for the new SDP attributes.
> 
> Now, as I assume the attributes will never be used in a mux scenario, the question is which category shall be used. Suhas/Paul? NOT RECOMMENDED?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: 09 February 2016 21:50
> To: Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
> 
> Thanks, Charles.
> 
> We’re awaiting sign-off from Christer that his points on both drafts are properly addressed.  Once that happens there are no more open issues.
> 
> Two comments:
> 
> - We think draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket is ready for WGLC
> - We’d appreciate some direction from the chairs on how to move forward the new draft (draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri) that was spawned from this effort, which we also believe is ready for WGLC.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> 
> 
>> On Feb 9, 2016, at 2:43 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Ram and other draft authors,
>> 
>> Thanks for updating and posting the revised draft ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-06 ). 
>> I would like to poll the working group to see if people think this draft is now ready for WGLC.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Charles
>> 
>> On 2/3/16, 12:20 AM, "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Charles / WG,
>>> 
>>> We have published a new revision of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket 
>>> and also draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri which addresses the comments 
>>> given by Christer
>>> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/S_MlYOJz-kkE3yLu5IANL9
>>> 3ndmM)
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Ram
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: bfcpbis <[e-mail]> on behalf of Cisco Employee 
>>> <[e-mail]>
>>> Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 at 10:12 AM
>>> To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[e-mail]>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro 
>>> (gsalguei)" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" 
>>> <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" 
>>> <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
>>> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: 
>>> draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
>>> 
>>>> Hi Charles,
>>>> 
>>>> I will get back with responses and updated diffs to 
>>>> draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri soon. I agree that we should wait till 
>>>> this is resolved before looking to start WGLC.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ram
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[e-mail]>
>>>> Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 12:14 am
>>>> To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <[e-mail]>, 
>>>> "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]"
>>>> <[e-mail]>
>>>> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, 
>>>> Cisco Employee <[e-mail]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action:
>>>> draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
>>>> 
>>>>> Christer reviewed draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri and recommended 
>>>>> substantial changes to it. The authors have not yet responded to 
>>>>> that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regarding draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket, I¹d like to see this 
>>>>> response and potential impacts on either/both drafts before 
>>>>> starting WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Charles
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/13/15, 10:02 AM, "bfcpbis on behalf of Gonzalo Salgueiro 
>>>>> (gsalguei)"
>>>>> <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> New version of the draft has been published and addresses all open 
>>>>>> comments raised by Christer.  At this point authors feel this is 
>>>>>> ready for WGLC.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There is a pending request for Christer to review the 
>>>>>> complementary draft he requested
>>>>>> (draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-00) be split off from the original 
>>>>>> document. Once this is done, we ask the chairs for guidance on how 
>>>>>> best to progress this spin-off draft.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Gonzalo
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 12:43 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
>>>>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line 
>>>>>>> Internet-Drafts directories.
>>>>>>> This draft is a work item of the Binary Floor Control Protocol 
>>>>>>> Bis Working Group of the IETF.
>>>>>>>        Title           : The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the
>>>>>>> Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
>>>>>>>        Authors         : Victor Pascual
>>>>>>>                          Antón Román
>>>>>>>                          Stéphane Cazeaux
>>>>>>>                          Gonzalo Salgueiro
>>>>>>>                          Ram Mohan Ravindranath
>>>>>>>                          Sergio Garcia Murillo
>>>>>>> Filename        : draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
>>>>>>> Pages           : 14
>>>>>>> Date            : 2015-10-13
>>>>>>> Abstract:
>>>>>>>   The WebSocket protocol enables two-way realtime communication 
>>>>>>> between
>>>>>>>   clients and servers.  This document specifies a new WebSocket sub-
>>>>>>>   protocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor
>>>>>>>   Control Protocol (BFCP) entities to enable usage of BFCP in new
>>>>>>>   scenarios.
>>>>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocke
>>>>>>> t/ There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05
>>>>>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websock
>>>>>>> et-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the 
>>>>>>> time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are 
>>>>>>> available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>> 
>>> 
>