[bfcpbis] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-08: (with COMMENT)

"Kathleen Moriarty" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 18 January 2017 20:46 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148477238653.1935.13141262288783728473.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:46:26 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/0aEYOtaN3e1Uo17iVc0yEAPEiGI>
Cc: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri@ietf.org, bfcpbis@ietf.org, eckelcu@cisco.com, bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [bfcpbis] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-08: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I may have missed it, but don't see a clear reason (would expect to see
it in the security considerations section) as to why TLS isn't a MUST. 
RECOMMENDED is good, but having a reason to justify this would be
helpful.  It seems like it is for legacy support of HTTP applications,
but spelling that out might be helpful.

[bfcpbis] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dra… Kathleen Moriarty
Re: [bfcpbis] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)