Re: [bfcpbis] [MMUSIC] m= line protocol in case of ICE

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Sun, 20 November 2016 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADFA1294A0 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:28:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nef7xo_qlR3S for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wj0-x22a.google.com (mail-wj0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C8B412946D for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wj0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id mp19so19881779wjc.1 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:28:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vzBmfAOvxxZIB9aJXSNpaOqgQ4liCxBsvTKG+v3QcFE=; b=ZgCAa2BAyjG+1RbDEL8iEiax47nBgT1OfcPDXxbd4rYL7rdcAd8ELNXSUmMH2JvO2C YL+P6Uwv/LIDQxg8qCJeBGMTANe4Y29FCBqM9k80859YSfRHQfSFdXhJIpa+gtdo930e 4KaaPoJn4pqoSWiWSTQkEuVtzCjaPyGV2RtS12ggs6Ju0EWJjT46wVvy4Bk6/HA0EeVb M+6QNK3EaXJO2B9CQ1bRvEmcmuZKCi7OyWCovL7mEmOkpSAOPhPspqiw0gvLM8ehm3fE KvR6Q9tfpGrpGvnBcJRG7nbi+LyrnJ5WTdAdR02plJspARUU8U0WMcVPN5Lf9tket+nK xzbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vzBmfAOvxxZIB9aJXSNpaOqgQ4liCxBsvTKG+v3QcFE=; b=escjmrPIkH+LWeu6D2fTMj3L8T63K7fMx+ZzbCSvZaOoT7nGnJpja3wzwmuRDmI7jX jg5zdjeEANkXIw3C3dmyMiWnPjx+9lL4wqu84JQ0KqV34eEPY6lxvRLjvJSJLZhggYil M7Hx4YYO6XubWv8r5mvydDngCvQ3p98lUPTtA7YaD55eNdQpfRcQD+EyT3jKVnPDSC+K mMheCd52e7OngKbttUtInly+jNif1YpJngl0rObRtVFcCAUxs1oYMTPiR0Hy6IccctjO 1zLYGMdURGML5VPA1CbcVeeUXeSgSTGuEnyHYCoLptT+t4I7F9a05/IROFm55Il2raoN ug8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02tcUJ3sLQkI25ICgZDhcdHcgwNeQ/UuPJg2nB1rfRq2omQSj5qCTbWdmmW7EW29Sk87r8OVXZ/55gyQw==
X-Received: by 10.194.222.202 with SMTP id qo10mr6921781wjc.115.1479684486601; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:28:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.23.196 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:27:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxuFK_R8d=VYS6WSF87zhce4OEFtiJUqhi5sQB8rp9BCYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD5OKxuhvCz82+7JK8QrArtrYcjV9+b7vWMpWRnCjNbrL++srA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4BE3AE83@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxu15YgYO0xyWMYXv7VTAVVQ71iJhH_txt31BV0CvCSjqg@mail.gmail.com> <F96AC385-2721-4652-98F5-1BF92F06214A@gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsyEpeOTDYNjkxz0AEM8UELGhbrC0dWgUh2VTR9oyaOrA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxuFK_R8d=VYS6WSF87zhce4OEFtiJUqhi5sQB8rp9BCYA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:27:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegf=3F7QGmL2n0yaek99UimoMDW+0=TaFET3E5bMDaewWDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/1T4-fIIpvohbp-ZuZNwXM8vY2MQ>
Cc: ice@ietf.org, bfcpbis@ietf.org, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, Alan Ford <alan.ford@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] [MMUSIC] m= line protocol in case of ICE
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:28:10 -0000

2016-11-21 0:23 GMT+01:00 Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>:
> I just wanted to add to my previous email, that according to RFC 6544
> protocols running over tcp candidates MUST use  RFC 4571 framing
> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6544#section-10.1). This means that BFCP
> running over tcp candidate is not TCP/BFCP and will require a different
> transport tag.

IMHO the exact transport is just "ICE". ICE itself is a "virtual
transport" that can use many "real transports" (UDP, TCP+RFC4571,
etc).

So ICE/BFCP would be my way to go.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>