[bfcpbis] Fwd: SDP directorate Review request: <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-08.txt>

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Fri, 20 December 2013 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B3C1AE34F for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:44:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61hVfPiPRWAQ for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:44:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC67C1AE34D for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:44:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a1so2555764wgh.35 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:44:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TIGim4uuVD4NkRb5u7Bp7FwKlWk2s8KiFJfqE5Dwudo=; b=bc2vN3jUlYI6f0VXm69J5nlRJMvGG8wmSQ7yNBKmJuDBO9Yy8wHJpAJgrp7ciSYMJk Sx1DS2RK53WsWK+Bbp+iUuEFB27fuE4oMh15bbDzFrZURg7mwMjWTY2tKnWJfOp2C6si pNXNfmHAg6BK0nWfwIX8T76C8sHeYCrm4b3TUNGa2E2X42Adl+LakDIQM2x7pTCvlRG2 90aDfHx07z8tCAbIoEt4fkK2Q+SoMdl1wWVt6OWKfK0EoR2P/j9Vdej92DbY8ASIow/7 GfhXVOuzqamwfNJj+f9BlAY/vqeKwOwLq3PjL00x1I2kMLECQ5c9FKX15+TFHIqV8Or8 R4Bw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.13.170 with SMTP id i10mr7583234wic.36.1387550652466; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:44:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.172.9 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:44:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52B4533A.5050007@ericsson.com>
References: <CAHBDyN6g6iAwHE3m4sLFM3ono8xt502Wu49ugar32_foGRQ4-Q@mail.gmail.com> <52B04EEF.8020200@ericsson.com> <CAHBDyN7UWFH3yviZ=kCD8OA5X6dyMYZTHwvWHiEzXqcrjr-KCw@mail.gmail.com> <52B1C65E.3050406@ericsson.com> <52B4533A.5050007@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:44:12 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN5p19U=_GNAK57_FGxqKGii96Bxr1ofGqDCKQKxPx=Z3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c242e0bf8ae504edf84f14"
Subject: [bfcpbis] Fwd: SDP directorate Review request: <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-08.txt>
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:44:18 -0000

FYI...here's the SDP directorate review for 4583bis.

Mary.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: SDP directorate Review request:
<draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-08.txt>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Cc: "mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Charles
Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com>,
draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis.authors@tools.ietf.org, Richard Barnes
<rlb@ipv.sx>


Hi Mary,

Ali turned out to be a very fast reviewer :)

Here's the SDP review: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/
msg12884.html

Happy holidays!


Cheers,
Ari


On 12/18/13 5:59 PM, Ari Keränen wrote:

> Hi Mary,
>
> Unfortunately not at least a good one.
>
> Sometimes we get a volunteer the same day (no one has volunteered for
> this draft yet), sometimes we have to ask a few times, and sometimes we
> end up doing it by ourselves if no one volunteers. We have usually given
> at least a few weeks for volunteers before using the last option.
>
> Given the holidays (e.g., I'll be out of office from next Friday until
> 4th of January), I would not be surprised if we have to wait until
> January to get someone.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ari
>
> On 12/18/13 5:52 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
>
>> Do you have an ETA for getting a volunteer just so we know the timing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mary.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com
>> <mailto:ari.keranen@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Mary,
>>
>>     Yes, the MMUSIC chairs assign (well, kindly ask volunteers for :)
>>     SDP directorate reviews. I'll send a request and get back to you
>>     once we have a volunteer.
>>
>>
>>     Cheers,
>>     Ari
>>
>>
>>     On 12/17/13 12:00 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
>>
>>         Sorry for the duplicate, but I thought it best to resend with an
>>         edited
>>         subject line.
>>
>>         Thanks,
>>         Mary.
>>
>>
>>         On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Mary Barnes
>>         <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com <mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
>>         <mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@__gmail.com
>>         <mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>              Hi guys,
>>
>>              I have agreed to be the shepherd for
>>              draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-__08
>>
>>         (http://tools.ietf.org/html/__draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-__08
>>         <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-08>).
>>                 Prior to progressing the document we need a review by
>>         the SDP
>>              directorate.  My understanding is that the MMUSIC WG chairs
>>         do the
>>              assignments for the SDP directorate.  If that is not the
>>         case, can
>>              you please forward to whomever does those and cc me.
>>         Otherwise,
>>              can you please assign someone to review this document?
>>         Given the
>>              holidays, I think it would be reasonable to expect the
>>         review to be
>>              completed by January 13th.
>>
>>              Thanks,
>>              Mary.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>