[bfcpbis] Implementation status of the drafts

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 21 January 2013 17:57 UTC

From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:57:45 +0100
Thread-Topic: Implementation status of the drafts
Thread-Index: Ac34ANE8S0iCTAbiSmmgZzXRaygF5A==
Message-ID: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE20D7468B0DC@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [bfcpbis] Implementation status of the drafts
Precedence: list

(As WG cochairs)

For the publication request, we are asked to give an indication of the implementation status of the drafts, so that the IESG can identify whether the protocol as described actually works in practice.

We have been told that there have been some working implementations in the past, but it would be useful to get an update.

Could I ask people therefore to reply to the list, or if you prefer, directly to the WG chairs, identifying what if anything has been implemented from the two bfcpbis drafts (and at what version).

As this is a replacement of the original BFCP documents RFC 4582 and RFC 4583, it would also be useful to have indications of the implementation of those documents.

Regards

Keith

[bfcpbis] Implementation status of the drafts DRAGE, Keith (Keith)