Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-05.txt

Tom Kristensen <2mkristensen@gmail.com> Wed, 29 August 2012 07:50 UTC

Return-Path: <2mkristensen@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0CE21F855A for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZnPaJiQCwM-1 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB38A21F8557 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so514585obb.31 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hhO2fkJ1A/7R5BMH3PZsNrPss+vv3sLDLQ9QLXGPhvM=; b=DD1B+lDZ50EcKrasC5KQWDqddRC6RbamlaogevS+t08o8y/WhWadkWIvm2TsCburMM K6m0eAiiEuV9Fi9/BNBuDnIHHjefc2TKMjqtGX04pL/rv/B3tB36+dTvE7pSSJQfPSQ2 KjehVAmzaMGB/m2YSUH4N2sqeEr/kDNbWajdxBaDfsAKoxsv4qVW0i5/iceazXik0xJs j8jINvxj+F7DmWcpLFrclhPzNvsaQDaWEDsJWEDO5pDHX2ysZ4jMC9N4AkH0//mt+CV4 Y4Wkz1ZG03Hevpikc7e3rrWgz9o7VExxTbBQwkWG76psoq1ny4rYmyyYcgVyxB9wY5/Y YQ0w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.169.100 with SMTP id ad4mr541851oec.21.1346226655463; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.193.105 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <503DC8A2.3080003@cisco.com>
References: <20120829073839.15316.16116.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <503DC8A2.3080003@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:50:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFHv=r8962uv9LWPrrAy-6OpWz-pHsagfQYuu+d+eikF=hvGjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Kristensen <2mkristensen@gmail.com>
To: Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: bfcpbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-05.txt
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:51:01 -0000

... and you may want the side-by-side diff between -04 and -05:
http://bit.ly/UaeXvE

-- Tom


On 29/08/2012, Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com> wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 09:38 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>>   This draft is a work item of the Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis
>> Working Group of the IETF.
>>
>> 	Title           : The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
>> 	Author(s)       : Gonzalo Camarillo
>>                            Keith Drage
>>                            Tom Kristensen
>>                            Joerg Ott
>>                            Charles Eckel
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-05.txt
>> 	Pages           : 87
>> 	Date            : 2012-08-29
>>
> [...]
>
> Updated according to agreement in BFCPbis WG session at IETF-84,
> Vancouver, i.e. fixed comments and issues raised by Alfred Heggestad's
> review posted on list 2012-07-16 and the discussion in that e-mail thread:
>
> - Keep SHOULD clear R and F flags for senders (over reliable
> transports). Add "MUST be ignored by receivers". No functional changes.
> - Clarify text regarding fragmentation. No functional changes.
> - Remove remains of ErrorAck behaviour. Clarify text. No functional
> changes.
> - Clarify and focus text for NAT traversal/keepalive. No functional
> changes.
>      . mention usage of STUN Binding Indication for keepalives
>      . point to ICE for how to use it
>
> Should be ready for WGLC - as was the conclusion at IETF-84!
>
> -- Tom
> _______________________________________________
> bfcpbis mailing list
> bfcpbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>


-- 
# Cisco                         |  http://www.cisco.com/telepresence/
## tomkrist@cisco.com  |  http://www.tandberg.com
###                               |  http://folk.uio.no/tomkri/