[bfcpbis] Data type clarifications of Conference ID + User ID

Kristoffer Gleditsch <kgledits@cisco.com> Fri, 23 March 2012 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <kgledits@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07ED421F84D0 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WATFbcKESFdC for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB3F21F84F8 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=kgledits@cisco.com; l=2592; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1332509693; x=1333719293; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject; bh=xf2lhvjneKFlV+2iGq4e638ImPcwCngX/I9Gte3/xQk=; b=kilGEPIbLnoSgLctj59nmikQDCmoo19GHmZQWcOgLizzQESB+0jH3gdy bDDrum8FXwZsHadnC6Ak8KHPMh41T4iuczidjSFwAxVm73WY6MyvNiDd8 qf2KIIeR+AQZtu/PiH10v5pvaiP44FhLrYMWHjx1jAHnniSCY3EEeIYyQ g=;
X-Files: 4582bis.patch, 4583bis.patch : 1029, 530
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmkHAKp7bE+Q/khN/2dsb2JhbAA7BwKDDoIxrzmDD4EHgiIBEEQBED0NCQsCCwMCAQIBWAgBAR6HaJhMgSeNCJF1iluDAgQHAYIEgRgEjmeBIoVXhW6IVoFogmg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,636,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="69188934"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2012 13:34:52 +0000
Received: from [10.47.37.194] ([10.47.37.194]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2NDYpsb014322 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:34:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4F6C7BFB.5060705@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:34:51 +0100
From: Kristoffer Gleditsch <kgledits@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120316 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080807080404090903000606"
Subject: [bfcpbis] Data type clarifications of Conference ID + User ID
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:34:58 -0000

Hi!

See the attached diffs to the 4582bis and 4853bis drafts.

The motivation of the 4582bis change is to make sure nobody thinks
Conference ID = -42 is legal.  (I left Transaction ID as it was, since
it carries no meaning apart from uniqueness.)

The motivation of the 4583bis change is to make sure nobody thinks they
can put "a=userid: 0xa" in the SDP to express User ID = 10.

Regards,
Kristoffer