Re: [bfcpbis] Progressing 4582bis and 4583bis

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Wed, 16 April 2014 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1C61A0250 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id exrRG5RhCDDt for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5F71A0165 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w61so11029050wes.18 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dxDLjc/bjLvRJGpQ5Bri3lOtd89GF0cU6voufgIhhsA=; b=K6DwpnheAkYaaH83Qr5jEPO1g3VYwD4pQxL2iLJh9HBQFzgNscG/RUZtYnjmCZp3SE UYYW6sjsndZoGsrUV8IbnwHT1Mz33LnZY2BKFw+G2VuI/phF5Ttn5k6pbU8LehmuZooI D8pOoza4xybUhPQ2tGWq8MixFwvVtD9Xm0JHJ9ztHdPp9rx5UbhL/YsTm5FM1DPtVcPW xQFrdgYwcq/GliH4E+9D7Y/06MVulEGPMVT1sr8f2a8lF+86lDgfaNeXIv0Ck/zF5yhq bB5lT0DQYfmgQ3WUgYmSH7DLOj7wZgbmIIF/ghsuofw9o/aspbOMJhJMMV9TTK9wza4O NI4A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.149.143 with SMTP id ua15mr8352091wib.36.1397668149995; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.10.6 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:09:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN7Ft9WY08h85B3ZX89UBt-_XoaDQUc6w6=1bMcyK9qxpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Tom Kristensen <2mkristensen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c38e70982ded04f72bf920
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/9rj8HrERKTNl-mcd-lx3acl3KXY
Cc: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Progressing 4582bis and 4583bis
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:09:19 -0000

I did not see a response to this comment from Christer:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis/current/msg00302.html

Also, I have not yet reviewed the most recent version against my proto
write-up preparation reviews on Dec. 18, 2013.

Once, the next revision is submitted, I'll do that within a week or so and
of course, we would want confirmation from Christer that he is okay with
the changes.  And, I'm assuming Charles will double-check that all his
editorial comments were addressed.

I'm also finding it difficult looking at the archives to know which version
is being discussed. Including version numbers in the emails is extremely
helpful. Otherwise, I have to look at dates and see how they match with the
version that's active during that timeframe.  For example, for this thread,
I have no idea which version is being referenced:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis/current/msg00308.html
So, I don't know in which version any changes should appear.

Regards,
Mary.


On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Tom Kristensen <2mkristensen@gmail.com>wrote:

> And for the record, I did go through the diff between the currently
> published version (fresh for the London IETF) and the one before to make
> sure the issues raised on the mailing list were addressed and fixed. I do
> believe that is true.
>
> -- Tom
>
>
> On 7 April 2014 12:04, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the quick response, Tom.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> On 07/04/2014 1:02 PM, Tom Kristensen wrote:
>> > Comments from Charles was fine and is fixed, will respond to list.
>> >
>> > I'm currently trying to figure out how to cope with Christer's input and
>> > issues, will respond to list for that as well.
>> >
>> > The time plan should be fixing immediately, so any delay is very much
>> > unfortunate :( I agree.
>> >
>> > -- Tom
>> >
>> > On 04/07/2014 08:47 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> the call for comments on 4582bis and 4583bis is over. I have not seen
>> >> any response to the comments Charles sent a couple of weeks ago.
>> >> Additionally, Christer has also sent some comments.
>> >>
>> >> What is the time plan to progress these drafts?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Gonzalo
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> bfcpbis mailing list
>> >> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bfcpbis mailing list
>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>
>
>
>
> --
> # Cisco                         |  http://www.cisco.com/telepresence/
> ## tomkrist@cisco.com  |  http://www.tandberg.com
> ###                               |  http://folk.uio.no/tomkri/
>
> _______________________________________________
> bfcpbis mailing list
> bfcpbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>
>