Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis

Currently 6.3.2 "NAT Traversal" is a subsection of 6.3 "Large Message Considerations". Is this really the intention, or should NAT Traversal better be renumbered as section 6.4?

Regards,
Ernst

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
> Sent: Samstag, 22. September 2012 02:36
> To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis
> 
> Just a gentle reminder that we are into the last week for 
> comments. Please review the draft and submit your comments by 
> the Sept 28th, 2012 deadline (not 2011 as erroneously typed 
> previously)
> 
> Thanks,
> Charles (as co-chair)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 7:06 AM
> > To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
> > Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis
> > 
> > (As WG co-chair)
> > 
> > This is to announce a working group last call for 
> draft-ietf-bfcpbis-
> > rfc4582bis, "The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)".
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis/
> > 
> > This is intended as a Standards Track RFC, obsoleting RFC 4582.
> > Please respond to the list by September 28th 2011 (i.e. 3 
> weeks) with any
> > comments.
> > 
> > It is helpful to attempt to categorize your comment (e.g. 
> technical issue vs.
> > editorial), and also  to provide any replacement text you 
> feel is necessary.
> > If you review the document and have no comments, please 
> tell the chairs
> > that you have reviewed it. This is always useful 
> information in assessing the
> > degree of WG review and consensus behind the document.
> > Note, another WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis will 
> be run in parallel.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Charles
> _______________________________________________
> bfcpbis mailing list
> bfcpbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
> 