Re: [bfcpbis] BFCP over DTLS
Tom Kristensen <2mkristensen@gmail.com> Mon, 04 June 2012 12:58 UTC
Return-Path: <2mkristensen@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D4521F87AE for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 05:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_72=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uNQ7VIWebLP3 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 05:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC12B21F87AA for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 05:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so3208684lag.31 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 05:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=E25NAAY7sSQ8ryo8aI2RmleWkpu7ZPwbMbJ4JlHjuqU=; b=NdSZ8+GqAZVx0UJlcjQlovJm6XytSPmlmVexet0WYUklt3D8e7gylr4N7u1fpadrdC QWFmnSxwK1ZFBCRcYk8jh6Xv52c3FPoOw83nw4bX5sWEImz+iUu0e1tLlzTezuzhM7b5 7PUAeVedvpF5FyFCfMAThHoWnn35PY2IJpKABcUUonCiAuYp5jEqgZemmmeJq18gS9gQ 3l5Gv0Bm2UFXacIDej+FW1o+RnPn3vfDddcmOkI//ez5Q0zwbUN1Z3iPTjIyBAKHE+hw SB5uSwqlTa267jMNrp4eTgGU0lX7DGJjn1DtryC7axWEk2uCMTic2PGl+cM5kv02j5KR 5FMA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.148.169 with SMTP id tt9mr12453943lab.49.1338814726803; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 05:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.23.169 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 05:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CBEBC8DC.A448%alanford@cisco.com>
References: <CAMxBvpB0pnr4Rr31m=mrypiXBJxZjk2bCvroguWAvXxzPRKjiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CBEBC8DC.A448%alanford@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:58:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFHv=r-khkoZcyXoVeqOdb13au5kLT1bTR16k6S-OaoAd6KCoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Kristensen <2mkristensen@gmail.com>
To: Alan Ford <alanford@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: bfcpbis@ietf.org, Woo Johnman <wuym2000cn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] BFCP over DTLS
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:58:49 -0000
The wording are now fixed in the just submitted rfc4582bis-03 version, according to Alan's input. Please verfify that the current text is suitable and clear. -- Tom On 30/05/2012, Alan Ford <alanford@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, there should indeed be a reference to RFC6347 for DTLS in Section 7. > > The line referencing [7] says: > > For a UDP/ DTLS connection established using the same exchange, > either party can be the DTLS server depending on the setup attributes > exchanged, as defined in [7]. > > This is referring to the use of the DTLS setup attributes (a=setup) in the > SDP, which is discussed in [7] (Section 7.1). It definitely does not > suggest > the use of SRTP. I guess it could be a bit clearer in the text; the updates > in 4572bis also touch on this. > > Regards, > Alan > > On 30/05/2012 10:35, "Woo Johnman" <wuym2000cn@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I feel BFCP over DTLS is not well documented in rfc4582bis. >> At section 7 "Lower-Layer Security". >> It says "BFCP floor control servers >> and clients MUST support TLS for transport over TCP and MUST support >> DTLS >> for >> transport over UDP [4]." But reference [4] is only about BFCP over >> TLS. >> Reference for BFCP over DTLS seems missing. >> At the end of the same section,it seems say DTLS connection setup >> procedure shall >> follow [7]. If it is true, does it mean BFCP message is packeted as >> SRTP? If not, would it be better to >> give more details about DTLS connection setup and packetization. >> >> Please give more explain. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Youngmin >> _______________________________________________ >> bfcpbis mailing list >> bfcpbis@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis > > > > _______________________________________________ > bfcpbis mailing list > bfcpbis@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis > -- # Cisco | http://www.cisco.com/telepresence/ ## tomkrist@cisco.com | http://www.tandberg.com ### | http://folk.uio.no/tomkri/
- [bfcpbis] BFCP over DTLS Woo Johnman
- Re: [bfcpbis] BFCP over DTLS Alan Ford
- Re: [bfcpbis] BFCP over DTLS Tom Kristensen