[bfcpbis] please review drafts prior to IETF 84
"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Wed, 18 July 2012 18:41 UTC
Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A199521F848F for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CpWPkSSUt9Zr for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3FC21F8494 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=eckelcu@cisco.com; l=820; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1342636926; x=1343846526; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=1k6Jg0fz8+p9v91CPt2Ilaaygz7/2xGpIFhokEI+sBk=; b=dM/03h/0ZMRkCi8c9CQVmVraq4QLyB3PWm4ewLeKnqQQ0POXuZe2Oip4 pevW99FpodV5d3csfhkiPPlncxLoO8QIdf+AtcGkRsr021+QCqTOIKjki fIbbwyzIPJduzIVwBpg4tnkDYeAvInfgxwi8W/CBPzfiQslWE8fRFdYGs 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAH4CB1CtJXG//2dsb2JhbABFuTSBB4IiAQQSASdRASoUQiYBBBsah2oBC5xPgSigL5EvYAOWV40QgWaCXw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,611,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="103133970"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2012 18:42:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6IIg5Ij018037 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:42:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.205]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:42:05 -0500
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: please review drafts prior to IETF 84
Thread-Index: Ac1lFQZxA/rC9LbGSeyVKyp+0985qw==
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:42:04 +0000
Message-ID: <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C0882803F649@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [171.68.122.35]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19050.000
x-tm-as-result: No--31.429400-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [bfcpbis] please review drafts prior to IETF 84
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:41:15 -0000
I'd like to thank Tom for posting the updated versions of both drafts before the submission deadline: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis/ Thanks as well to those who have already provided review comments. Please be sure to review and raise any open issues prior to IETF 84. We'd like to be able to address any outstanding areas/issues before and/or during the IETF 84, such that we can start WGLC on the drafts following IETF 84. Currently, the draft agenda divides the majority of the time between the two drafts. If there are any significant open issues, I'd like to add them explicitly the agenda so as to make sure we make the best use of our working group session. Cheers, Charles (co-chair)
- [bfcpbis] please review drafts prior to IETF 84 Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- [bfcpbis] Out-of-sequence or unexpected FloorRequ… Horvath, Ernst
- Re: [bfcpbis] Out-of-sequence or unexpected Floor… Horvath, Ernst
- Re: [bfcpbis] Out-of-sequence or unexpected Floor… Tom Kristensen