Re: [bfcpbis] transaction issue

Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com> Mon, 04 June 2012 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <tomkrist@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E8A21F87A8 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 06:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PV7Wh1T1UFu4 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 06:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B48F21F86AD for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 06:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=tomkrist@cisco.com; l=594; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1338815243; x=1340024843; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XXLzKs8tQs26TnRP64N/YQVe7h5PbTcxWqgYrl/0Fy8=; b=HXWx1A5CpKhiCW6ew8VIJBnsYVHmFlhFOafodQZkS5wsmAMaVAT8kBDh wZVU8qXRvv+eRn2MC3yDz/jh29Zsxz37G4aScgfOCriJZ1F9XsFCGRCR5 2QLXOP29EcSi8amwS0HP++9cD5yToz89RxQDOFzu2hkGCalfBIIW8WMNq c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApAFAOWxzE+Q/khM/2dsb2JhbABEgx2tN4NTgQeCGAEBAQQSASUwERALGAklDwJGEwEHAQEeh2mXBJ8sixGCeoMWA5UbhVCDWAGEZ4FmgmI
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,712,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="74005535"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2012 13:07:19 +0000
Received: from [10.61.91.28] (ams3-vpn-dhcp6941.cisco.com [10.61.91.28]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q54D7J1G015918; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 13:07:19 GMT
Message-ID: <4FCCB307.40001@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:07:19 +0200
From: Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
References: <CAMxBvpCckVJmRQdatTXgmqKOfW=Ev_G2Knp0=yqLFJcw57-xtA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMxBvpCckVJmRQdatTXgmqKOfW=Ev_G2Knp0=yqLFJcw57-xtA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Woo Johnman <wuym2000cn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] transaction issue
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:07:24 -0000

On 06/01/2012 11:59 AM, Woo Johnman wrote:
> Hi,
> The RFC4582bis says:"As described in previous paragraph every entity -
>     client or server - is only allowed to send one request at a time, and
>     await the acknowledging response."
> I think the condition of only one pending request at a time is too hard.
> Is it more suitable that there is one pending request at a time per conference
> or ever per connection(client-server)?
>    
Woo,

Thanks for the comment. I have to read the text chunks related to this 
once more and rethink this approach; I'll be back!

-- Tom