IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bfcpbis] AD Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-24: role issue

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Wed, 12 September 2018 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02651130ECA for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SkLVwYgEmiYx for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alum-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu (alum-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu [18.7.68.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB9C1200D7 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1207440e-c13ff7000000162b-36-5b998326cc95
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (OUTGOING-ALUM.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.33]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by alum-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id A8.CB.05675.723899B5; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:20:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PaulKyzivatsMBP.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id w8CLKbbu012655 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:20:38 -0400
To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
References: <1a54a9fe1d0d48a29b7bb70c80f27d81@ericsson.com> <39D21140-F791-481B-A01B-6A5CCFAD71B9@cisco.com> <eb2fdf2422e747eca18ad46b8be072a0@ericsson.com> <e7e15eb9-4816-0ed1-2d95-861a5b14cb0e@nostrum.com> <191e16d5-8cf6-f66f-41e5-ad62d580fd75@alum.mit.edu> <081DF52F-3AB7-460C-9C28-67F2766ABEAB@cisco.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <658b5955-b1bd-1797-2f73-c92543f28d15@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:20:37 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <081DF52F-3AB7-460C-9C28-67F2766ABEAB@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixO6iqKvRPDPa4Od8Dot/644yOTB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEr49nZFvaCc8wVDZs/MjUwPmbqYuTkkBAwkdiyaTNLFyMXh5DA DiaJ3pt/WSGcH0wSnXevMoJUCQsESSx7+YIFxBYREJHYMesiVNE+JonrdxaAJdgEtCTmHPoP ZvMK2Eus69rJCmKzCKhKHN2xlQ3EFhVIk/jbuYQRokZQ4uTMJ2D1nAK2Eh3rT7OD2MwCZhLz Nj9khrDFJW49mc8EYctLbH87h3kCI/8sJO2zkLTMQtIyC0nLAkaWVYxyiTmlubq5iZk5xanJ usXJiXl5qUW6xnq5mSV6qSmlmxghgcm3g7F9vcwhRgEORiUe3gahmdFCrIllxZW5hxglOZiU RHkXZwGF+JLyUyozEosz4otKc1KLDzFKcDArifC+ZgfK8aYkVlalFuXDpKQ5WJTEedlM9kYJ CaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZGU4OJQkeM2agBoFi1LTUyvSMnNKENJMHJwgw3mAhuuD1PAWFyTmFmem Q+RPMRpzNFzon8TM8ef91EnMQix5+XmpUuK8vxuBSgVASjNK8+CmwZLLK0ZxoOeEebNABvIA ExPcvFdAq5iAVn3eMwNkVUkiQkqqgXGVgZbe+jeXVuS/3rX8TG3KlcP39kgdd6h2ubrKZptM SqXT1F2JX/VPiH29slWX3ewZY3rH8u3P2He4yT5pynr/eDozx7/Yojq5ghM+a8NqrBWyvkzl 7rsptmLOKkZ+cX+x7NuN1swB8jcn3TYV97n5+ObbDUcKb/crtOzPM0pXVly/bX39jTQlluKM REMt5qLiRABPa+3+CQMAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/KgObTVhZGpIYx5zfEi0bLmIHiTA>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] AD Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-24: role issue
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 21:20:44 -0000

On 9/12/18 4:04 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote:

>      ISTM that to go this way the document should be returned to the WG. It
>      seems like too big a change to do otherwise.
> 
> I agree. This discussion is occurring on the WG list, and any changes/updated versions of the draft(s) will be vetted here as well. Are you suggesting something more formal, like another WGLC?

Sounds like a good idea. Force more eyeballs onto it.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email