[bfcpbis] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13: (with COMMENT)
"Spencer Dawkins" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 17 January 2017 15:47 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7501293F8; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:47:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148466803770.32051.5938243863646069856.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:47:17 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/LISQaY9kJQeZaO7f0qtnzm8VnM4>
Cc: bfcpbis@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket@ietf.org, eckelcu@cisco.com, bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [bfcpbis] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:47:18 -0000
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have a couple of questions on authentication in this draft. Does this text, Since the WebSocket API does not distinguish between certificate errors and other kinds of failure to establish a connection, it is expected that browser vendors will warn end users directly of any kind of problem with the server certificate. apply to any WebSocket-based application? In this text, A floor control server that receives a message over TCP/WS can request the use of TCP/WSS by generating an Error message, as described in Section 13.8 of [I-D.ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis], with an Error code with a value of 9 (use TLS). is "request" the right word? Or is "require" more accurate, if the server isn't going to establish a TCP/WS connection?
- [bfcpbis] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-bfcp… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [bfcpbis] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [bfcpbis] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-… Spencer Dawkins at IETF