Re: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-01.txt

Victor Pascual Avila <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com> Mon, 15 February 2016 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA8A1A1B60 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:36:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xDHQO22VbdJo for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:36:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F342F1A0197 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:36:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id g62so49205370wme.1 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:36:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i8KjveiAANjQo+W+a1SJdIV8eskcbZ+rvb8dzTlXioo=; b=d6/wgo8eLz5G6vze/Vd4XFBZxrNcdbU3NexWBNMZmOzAHs2ylLqp6rF9nCjfqwdeyl uvXuYil+XmmWSkpaU7C68qHYsygh8HfIGjhocj4uC2f7rHtT4zzxof1lIaCf0JdfjOu7 LIKbvVU2vLbLmFy+GtnihMvAmzZh04fpEeDuupZC4enUm1ym/+hJqML0fM8Uf8usfWRY dEULslPeCNFTZIUc4Pzd1RfNofCNYzS+JyuFGfdSsvrEp3t4HDoYAtWn9Q4F4sBJ0HIp KEAH8tFXg5CeF2DKCWLUFgnObj456dor7NT20iInHj/pBOTd11lzzN/vvVpnxK4riG/j e/GQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=i8KjveiAANjQo+W+a1SJdIV8eskcbZ+rvb8dzTlXioo=; b=X3vH/+7Fea5Oiqbt7G0W5bJPs1YrcdUOWHrYBBi5k3aa1IaXazN2BGyt0aWDwLA5hq prmCJ45YUs+8FeSu87HkymzPb+B+eECh4wJQjfzL+mAwLHKPcZAeN84qANgw8P2J8S6T 3WjymDemIeIkmTdGuRMqwXh/7MWk2qGotlhVFhK0rfvx+ilcT+XUs+Nr56e5IkpPnglC oh1KAW710pB2IWtVNFQWgQdZrgGnlRQxXKJ7PqWREgmzHx68VmUkzTldOiULcTFFl4jZ DXBonmZ0l3A6bcL86Ka+aOH/MsGQdXICC+Vnydvn0Xz88bJ9M4Qpq6TuQAMhILNUNr7A 6w1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSrG/fSJlPAF6Q0MQw1NeJO1JPWVVZcv9X0tueutwQvj5M3aFHZUvzq/hXKmJiughnjpfvLbK/sB5Q4Zw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.180.84 with SMTP id d81mr12336378wmf.42.1455528983464; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:36:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.16.67 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:36:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37DEF39D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <D2D7EFD6.5024B%rmohanr@cisco.com> <D2DF81D1.663E5%eckelcu@cisco.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37DEF39D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:36:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGTXFp8x1Rkkuvrp68EfmgPOW+yvxg4UATkfZbaHU9xxUCWa7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Victor Pascual Avila <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/NzXE3_tYUMb6rgl_Tl8uxBAbk6E>
Cc: "Ram Mohan R \(rmohanr\)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, "Charles Eckel \(eckelcu\)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-01.txt
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:36:27 -0000

I support adoption

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Christer Holmberg
<christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the draft is ready for adoption.
>
> Regards.
>
> Christer
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
> Sent: ‎09/‎02/‎2016 21:45
> To: Ram Mohan R (rmohanr); Christer Holmberg; bfcpbis@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-01.txt
>
> Ram and other draft authors,
>
> Thanks for updating and posting the revised draft.
> I would like to poll the working group to see if people think this draft
> is now ready to be adopted as a bfcpbis working group draft.
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
>
>
> On 2/3/16, 4:20 AM, "bfcpbis on behalf of Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)"
> <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of rmohanr@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi Christer,
>>
>>Thanks for the feedback. All the below comments has been take care and a
>>new revision is published. Please look at the diffs here:
>>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-02
>>
>>Link to draft  -
>>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-02
>>
>>Regards,
>>Ram
>>
>>From:  bfcpbis <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Christer Holmberg
>><christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
>>Date:  Wednesday, 21 October 2015 at 12:23 AM
>>To:  "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
>>Subject:  [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-01.txt
>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have reviewed draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-01.txt.
>>
>>I think the draft needs some editorial work, and there is also technical
>>procedures (related to SDP Offer/Answer) missing.
>>
>>Q3_1:    I suggest to remove ³Media² from the section titles. Instead the
>>text should indicate that the attributes are media-level attributes. Also,
>>in the text you should say something like ³This section defines a new SDP
>>media-level attribute,
>> <attribute-name>,Š.² instead of the current text which says ³The new
>>attribute MUST be a media levelŠ².
>>
>>Q3_2:    Sections 3.1 and 3.2 start with text saying:
>>
>>³Applications that use SDP for negotiation and also use WebSocket as a
>>              transport protocol MAY indicate the connection URI for the
>>WebSocketŠ²
>>
>>I don¹t think this text belongs in the attribute definition sections.
>>Instead I suggest to add a section ³3.1 General² where you describe the
>>need for the attributes.
>>
>>
>>Also, instead of saying ³Applications that use SDP for negotiationŠ² I
>>would say ³Applications that use the SDP Offer/Answer mechanism [RFC3264]
>>for negotiating mediaŠ².
>>
>>Q3_3:    There is no port information in c= lines.
>>
>>Q3_4:    There should be an ŒSDP Offer/Answer¹ section, describing the
>>usage of the attributes. The structure should be:
>>
>>   X.  SDP Offer/Answer Procedures
>>     X.1.  General
>>     X.2.  Generating the Initial SDP Offer
>>     X.3.  Generating the SDP Answer
>>     X.4.  Offerer Processing of the SDP Answer
>>     X.5.  Modifying the Session
>>
>>For example, in section X.5 you need to describe what it means to NOT
>>include the attributes in a subsequent offer. Does it mean that the
>>websocket connection shall be terminated? Etc.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Christer
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>bfcpbis mailing list
>>bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bfcpbis mailing list
> bfcpbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>



-- 
Victor Pascual Ávila