Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Wed, 24 October 2012 10:32 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A9821F8BAF for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.218
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.218 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id COOH8gTEVDLC for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B563B21F8B76 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f956d0000011c3-e6-5087c3bf4118
Received: from esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 72.5C.04547.FB3C7805; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:32:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.36.90] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:32:30 +0200
Message-ID: <5087C3BE.1080301@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:32:30 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com>
References: <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C088280A5951@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com> <CAHBDyN6E+dAwx0tVJHWQvYPK=F+=ptq1O=wsH74ELxpNfCrYDw@mail.gmail.com> <50753CEE.2080907@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <50753CEE.2080907@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre7+w+0BBl/uCVr8W3eUyWLTrC9s Fp/372e2uHLkF5sDi8eU3xtZPXbOusvusWTJT6YA5igum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujI9L+tkKjjFV zG9oYG1g/MHYxcjJISFgIrFx5hsWCFtM4sK99WxdjFwcQgKnGCVOflzHDOGsZpS4t2gdUAcH B6+AtsT+m9YgDSwCqhJfdi4CG8QmYCGx5dZ9sEGiAsES5zZuYwOxeQUEJU7OfAIWFxFQl+jb +50dZCazQDujxLmeu6wgCWEBW4n/m/axQCxbwygxYcYRsASngKbEvsOP2SHOk5R4M/km2CRm AT2JKVdbGCFseYntb+cwg9hCQMctf9bCMoFRaBaS5bOQtMxC0rKAkXkVo3BuYmZOermRXmpR ZnJxcX6eXnHqJkZgkB/c8lt1B+OdcyKHGKU5WJTEea237vEXEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2KLyrNSS0+ xMjEwSnVwFjtaLXqnrbbw4/Mgcca3rh+Z1ppvySB5dOthGkbfe1Orfh6hzNjw13NyU8Ng5o2 T28+t+uoosLnZNPvNtbZCfMcNeKe3GeO008W+Pco4tmFyi629+syNtm+qr57UTfKJ/cH4/6L R/cUPP2R+D9vMtutAxnC209OyuzSYpAJdPcVTJNRuFkcXKzEUpyRaKjFXFScCAC9UCMEQAIA AA==
Cc: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:32:36 -0000

Hi Tom,

> I don't remember why MAY was chosen here, but after having a look at
> this again I see that SHOULD is used for sending an Error message twice
> in the original RFC 4582. So, we should (!) change to SHOULD.  OK?

yes, the sending of error responses should appear at the SHOULD level.

Thanks,

Gonzalo