IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bfcpbis] New versions of rfc4582bis/rfc4583bis

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Tue, 30 April 2013 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD1521F9A4D for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 03:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HGtAqLWYJT1U for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 03:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BE121F9B8D for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 03:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2274; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1367316028; x=1368525628; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=G3rekNxTBWQ+eOsboPJdWzZs6R+ecc3dr0cFCMvuviA=; b=iDfRS2zLH1lKHYbA+ScQYe0pXz+Khu/aGEMQA5J7iszRxezkWjkdDxCU TGIohcfmSMR1Itvh5lCnY+prjCP+i9a0P8Mr35rR+5EjJnjLVkqfwkc9n 9dv5QEj9ssazG4u4DkIigDdmdESGqU4wgvvDb10Un6t8eim5zR2WYlnhS 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgFABuVf1GtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABSgwc2RL4TgQIWdIIfAQEBBAEBATc0BgUMBAIBCBEEAQEBChQJBycLFAkIAgQOBQgBEod7BwWxA45djmkxBwaCaGEDmESQBIMRgig
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,580,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="204695290"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2013 10:00:27 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3UA0R3N028340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:00:27 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.12]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:00:26 -0500
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "Tom Kristensen (tomkrist)" <tomkrist@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] New versions of rfc4582bis/rfc4583bis
Thread-Index: AQHOQoefzCp5y7aU0kqjelwPvw2OCJjui1zAgABVfwD//6z+4A==
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:00:26 +0000
Message-ID: <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C0882804809BA6@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com>
References: <517A8A7A.1010006@cisco.com> <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C0882804809B57@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com> <517F9568.5090502@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <517F9568.5090502@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.150.118]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, 'Tom Kristensen' <2mkristensen@gmail.com>, Alan Ford <alan.ford@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] New versions of rfc4582bis/rfc4583bis
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:00:33 -0000

Yes, darn auto-correct :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Kristensen (tomkrist)
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 10:57 AM
> To: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
> Cc: bfcpbis@ietf.org; 'Tom Kristensen'; Alan Ford
> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] New versions of rfc4582bis/rfc4583bis
> 
> I "asume" so ;)
> 
> I'll correct the typo locally and submit it in a later version.
> 
> -- Tom
> 
> On 04/30/2013 11:53 AM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote:
> > (as an individual)
> >
> > Tom and Alan,
> >
> > Thank you both for the addition of the version handling text. The
> changes look good to me.
> > One typo in section 7 of rfc4583-bis:
> > s/ MUST assume/MUST assume
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Charles
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bfcpbis-
> bounces@ietf.org]
> >> On Behalf Of Tom Kristensen (tomkrist)
> >> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 3:09 PM
> >> To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
> >> Cc: 'Tom Kristensen'; Alan Ford
> >> Subject: [bfcpbis] New versions of rfc4582bis/rfc4583bis
> >>
> >> The version negotiation mechanism in SDP and related version
> >> handling text is added to the two drafts for rfc4582bis and
> rfc4583bis
> >> as presented and discussed on this list earlier on.
> >>
> >> Thanks to Alan Ford for both initiating the discussion after
> interop
> >> testing and to provide a solution (and actual text to merge into
> the
> >> specifications).
> >>
> >>
> >>     The drafts are available here:
> >>       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis
> >>     ... and here:
> >>       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis
> >>
> >>     The diffs from the previous versions are available at:
> >>       http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-09
> >>     ... and at:
> >>       http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-07
> >>
> >> With this the remaining issue is solved, and I do believe the
> drafts
> >> are indeed ready for the final stages of the IETF process!
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> -- Tom
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> bfcpbis mailing list
> >> bfcpbis@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
> >>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email