Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-08.txt

"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> Sat, 11 June 2016 05:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rmohanr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10D912DA62 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 22:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id usJZAEJPMcni for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 22:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE6A412DA5E for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 22:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7862; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1465623764; x=1466833364; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=9hcDR0czClas29udG0XXNgilLMNo6GIvI/SqBYBrhkk=; b=NYxd9hDP5ojbQUwcZfSga2sdSQjlQkK62bvvpJ6UNjzt/FWJkaDEpwvj JQvWTZvrXejnKxJWG7y3vDRfKJRS40aJprbDu68aclGAKuiyvkj6SB4v2 p4Cix/4se1QmbPbNld/20pyKF5sGuujZVkYVpAZFop7NSb3XYpKnRleJ5 I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ANAgCHo1tX/5ldJa1egz5WfQavHIwAg?= =?us-ascii?q?XkXC4UrSgIcgQs4FAEBAQEBAQFlHAuERQEBAQQBAQEgEToXBAIBCBEDAQIBAgI?= =?us-ascii?q?mAgICHwYLFQgIAgQTiBYDFw6sdIxdDYN+AQEBAQEBAQECAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2BA?= =?us-ascii?q?YlzgkOBfYMBgloFmCs0AYYDhiqBeoFpToQEiGWGR4E5h2wBHjaDbm4BiQh/AQE?= =?us-ascii?q?B?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,454,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="284292488"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jun 2016 05:42:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (xch-rtp-020.cisco.com [64.101.220.160]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5B5ghYD021682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 05:42:43 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 01:42:42 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 01:42:42 -0400
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-08.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRu9IUz5Zg6VbDM0uIw59EcQDej5/U60yAgAmn1ACAAAiYgIAAAQOAgAELqoCABMdVAA==
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 05:42:42 +0000
Message-ID: <D381A264.5F480%rmohanr@cisco.com>
References: <20160601065147.20308.50318.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3b65d096-977d-9da6-aa9f-3883ec63dc4e@alum.mit.edu> <F249579F-6200-4902-B965-3E8ADFE1BF43@cisco.com> <75DDBE07-12A5-407E-95D3-E61F0375D672@cisco.com> <F6128D14-A336-40F0-ADC6-11F558F600DE@gmail.com> <D37DA069.5EC56%rmohanr@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D37DA069.5EC56%rmohanr@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.4.160422
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.65.89.58]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <339C271F0432E0468EF7B9EBD30C2C7A@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/RZ7s9AFE5cqF3U1TTsyazHf_qPU>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-08.txt
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 05:42:46 -0000

I just published a new revision addressing the comments below. Here is the
diff.

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-09


Regards,
Ram

-----Original Message-----
From: bfcpbis <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Cisco Employee
<rmohanr@cisco.com>
Date: Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 10:14 AM
To: Victor Pascual <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com>om>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro
(gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
Cc: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>rg>, "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)"
<eckelcu@cisco.com>om>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-08.txt

>Works for me as well.
>
>Thanks,
>Ram
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: bfcpbis <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Victor Pascual
><victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com>
>Date: Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 11:46 PM
>To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
>Cc: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>rg>, "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)"
><eckelcu@cisco.com>o.com>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
>Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action:
>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-08.txt
>
>>Fine with me
>>
>>> On 07 Jun 2016, at 20:12, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
>>><gsalguei@cisco.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I¹m OK with that approach.  I also agree that they are entirely too
>>>different in purpose to try and merge them.
>>> 
>>> -G
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:41 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
>>>><eckelcu@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> (As an individual)
>>>> 
>>>> Good question. I agree it seems a bit strange. But my thinking is that
>>>>our use of ³Updates² may not be appropriate. I view RFC 4582 and RFC
>>>>4583 as defining BFCP over TCP and over UDP. This draft takes BFCP over
>>>>TCP and defines how to encapsulate it within a WebSocket and how to
>>>>negotiate that encapsulation. So I think these drafts are related but
>>>>separate, and that we should remove the ³Updates² label and simply have
>>>>RFC4582bis and RFC4583bis as normative references (as they already
>>>>are). Thoughts?
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Charles
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 6/1/16, 7:14 AM, "bfcpbis on behalf of Paul Kyzivat"
>>>>><bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have a question.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> This document updates RFC4582bis and RFC4583bis.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Those documents are *drafts*. Does it really make sense to handle the
>>>>> changes this way? I guess that means that this document will need to
>>>>>be 
>>>>> held until they become RFCs, and then it can update them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Wouldn't it make more sense to simply make the changes in those
>>>>>drafts 
>>>>> now, before they become RFCs?
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Thanks,
>>>>>    Paul
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 6/1/16 2:51 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>>>>>directories.
>>>>>> This draft is a work item of the Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis
>>>>>>of the IETF.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>       Title           : The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for
>>>>>>the Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
>>>>>>       Authors         : Victor Pascual
>>>>>>                         Antón Román
>>>>>>                         Stéphane Cazeaux
>>>>>>                         Gonzalo Salgueiro
>>>>>>                         Ram Mohan Ravindranath
>>>>>>                         Sergio Garcia Murillo
>>>>>>    Filename        : draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-08.txt
>>>>>>    Pages           : 13
>>>>>>    Date            : 2016-05-31
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Abstract:
>>>>>>  The WebSocket protocol enables two-way realtime communication
>>>>>>between
>>>>>>  clients and servers.  This document specifies a new WebSocket sub-
>>>>>>  protocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor
>>>>>>  Control Protocol (BFCP) entities to enable usage of BFCP in new
>>>>>>  scenarios.  This document updates RFC4582bis and RFC4583bis.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-08
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-0
>>>>>>8
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>>>>>submission
>>>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>>>>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>>>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>bfcpbis mailing list
>>bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>
>_______________________________________________
>bfcpbis mailing list
>bfcpbis@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis